Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Cases – The Importance of Objections During a Philadelphia Murder Trial

    Preserving issues for appeal is crucial during a Philadelphia criminal trial.  Thus, it is important for defendants to have an experienced Philadelphia criminal lawyer on their side.  During criminal trials, such as a murder trial, an experienced lawyer knows when to make proper objections which later serve as grounds of appeal if defendants are convicted at trial.

    Click here to see a discussion of Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) Petitions.

    When a Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer makes an objection during trial, he is telling the judge that the prosecutor violated an evidence rule by trying to admit evidence that should not be admitted.  Evidence does not only include tangible evidence like a photo, document or weapon, it is also a statement made by parties and witnesses.

    After an objection is made, the judge will listen to the basis of the objection and arguments made by both sides as to why the evidence should or should not be admitted.  The judge will either overrule the objection, i.e., allow the evidence to be considered by the jury when deciding the verdict of the case, or sustain the objection, i.e., not allow the evidence to be considered by the jury.

    In many cases, defendants can appeal cases where a trial judge made an error and over a defense lawyer’s objections, allowed evidence that is actually inadmissible.  In general, appellate courts will consider objections and legal arguments made at trial.  If proper objections are not made at trial, defendants may have waived their rights to appeal even if the court was wrong in its ruling.  Objections must be made at the right juncture or it may also lead to a waiver.

    In a Philadelphia first degree murder trial, our top rated criminal defense lawyer, David Nenner, made timely and proper objections and preserved issues for appeal.  The appellate court awarded Mr. Nenner’s client a new trial due to Mr. Nenner’s objections and legal arguments at trial.  See Commonwealth of PA vs. Ronald Thomas, (PA Superior Court, 2015).

    Facts of the Philadelphia Murder Case

    Mr. Nenner’s client, Ronald Thomas (defendant), was charged with first degree murder of Anwar Ashmore (victim).  The victim allegedly stole cocaine from the defendant.  Prosecutors argued that this gave the defendant motive to shoot the victim twice in the chest in retaliation for the victim stealing from him.  At trial, prosecutors were allowed to admit damaging evidence over Mr. Nenner’s objections, and ultimately, the jury convicted the defendant of murder.  He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole.

    Click here to part 2 of this article which discusses the objections that Mr. Nenner made at trial.

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

    David Nenner is a Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer who handles cases such as homicide, gun possession and drug charges in Philadelphia. If you have a question about your case, schedule a FREE consultation with Mr. Nenner.  215.564.0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...