Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Credibility Issues in the Philadelphia Police Corruption Trial

    Last month, 6 Philadelphia police officers, former members of the narcotics division, were acquitted by a federal jury. The charges included allegations that the officers assaulted and stole money from suspects, planted evidence, falsified warrants, lied in trials, etc.

    Witnesses for the prosecution included roughly a dozen drug dealers and a fellow police officer who has already pled guilty and is serving a prison sentence. Defense attorneys zeroed in on the obvious credibility problems of these witnesses, repeatedly arguing that none of them could be trusted. Ultimately, the jury agreed with the defense, acquitting the officers of all charges. It’s unclear whether the officers will return to duty with the Philadelphia Police Department.

    Related: How Police Corruption Affects Your Philadelphia Criminal Case

    What Happened? Lessons Learned

    Police Corruption and Misconduct

    In the past several months, multiple police officers across the country have faced serious charges of misconduct. Some of the allegations are disturbing, including one of the most recent charges involving police officers from Baltimore who are accused of failing to get medical attention for a critically injured individual riding in the back of a police van. The individual ultimately died.

    Media attention on police misconduct issues helps combat something hardwired into the average citizen–that police officers act honorably. More and more, average citizens are realizing that police officers can actually be capable of serious misconduct. The jurors in the recent Philadelphia police corruption case were probably well-tuned to the issue of police misconduct. So what happened? Why did these jurors acquit all the officers?

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Credibility of Witnesses

    Criminal cases in Philadelphia are often taken to trial, whether in front of a judge or jury. That’s because credibility of a witness is probably the most important factor which determines the outcome of a criminal jury trial. This is true whether it’s a murder case or a drug possession case. If a key witness isn’t believable, then the prosecution’s entire case may crumble.

    The reality is that many witnesses in criminal trials have serious credibility problems. This is especially true when a witness or multiple witnesses in a case are drug dealers or have a history of untruthfulness. This is precisely what happened in the recent, historic Philadelphia police officer corruption trial. Without any credible supporting evidence, the jurors simply couldn’t hang their hats on the testimony of drug dealers and an admitted corrupt police officer. If there had been additional testimony about large cash purchases made by the officers, or other witnesses who saw some of the alleged conduct, we certainly may have seen a guilty verdict here.

    For more information about Philadelphia police corruption, please visit our law library.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.


    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...