FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Criminal Appeals in Philadelphia Criminal Cases

    Philadelphia Criminal Appellate Lawyer

    The job of a criminal lawyer often ends when the client’s case is resolved, either by way of a trial or plea. Most criminal lawyers will end their representation when the client is acquitted, i.e., gets a “Not Guilty” jury verdict, or takes a plea to a lesser crime and is sentenced.

    Criminal Appeals in Philadelphia

    However, the job of an appellate lawyer only begins when the criminal case is completed (i.e., the client is sentenced). The best criminal appeals lawyers certainly have their work cut out for them. Analyzing a Philadelphia criminal case for valid appeal issues requires an in-depth understanding of criminal law, procedure, trial tactics and of course, appellate law. That’s why criminal lawyers do not always practice appellate law. It’s not uncommon to find that instead of handling an appeals case on their own, a criminal lawyer in Philadelphia will refer the case to another lawyer. If you lost a criminal trial in Philadelphia, click here to learn about what you can do.

    3 Appeal Issues to Consider in a Typical Philadelphia Criminal Case

    There are many issues which can form the basis for an appeal or Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. Every case varies, and every criminal lawyer varies. Therefore, determining whether there are meritorious appeals issues requires analyzing the entire case, from start to finish. There may be suppression issues which must be reviewed, or there may be trial errors which affected the outcome of the case. In addition, the timeline of the case is also crucial and determines which type of appeal to pursue. What most people don’t know is that under Pennsylvania criminal law, direct appeals are different than PCRA petitions.

    1. Post-Sentence Motions

    jury trialA criminal appeals lawyer may be hired around the time of sentencing. It’s not uncommon for someone who lost at trial to hire another lawyer before sentencing. For example, someone who lost a robbery trial and is facing a long prison sentence may go out and hire another lawyer because of what’s at stake. There are many sentencing issues which may be raised, such as mitigation. It may be appropriate to prepare evidence for the sentencing hearing, such as statements from friends, family members, employers, etc.

    After sentencing occurs, a criminal defendant has the ability to file a motion with the original sentencing court. So long as the legal time requirements are met, a post-sentence motion may be appropriate. Post-sentence motions filed under Rule 710 of the PA Rules of Criminal Procedure may raise many issues. However, successful post-sentence motions will raise a valid legal issue, i.e., a recent court opinion which affects the case. For example, the day after sentencing, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issues a ruling favorable to the defendant. This new court ruling may be appropriate for a post-sentencing motion.

    2. Direct Appeals

    Like with post-sentence motions, direct appeals in criminal cases in Philadelphia must be filed within certain time limitations. In general, direct appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the sentencing order is entered, or 30 days from the date of the conviction. Direct appeals are filed with the intermediate appellate court, the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

    The grounds for an appeal will vary from case to case. One of the most common issues raised on direct appeal is court rulings on legal issues and at trial. For instance, a criminal defendant may appeal a ruling which allowed specific evidence into the record. However, the issue must have been preserved for appeal. Basically, if the issue wasn’t raised during the case, the appeals court has no way to examine the issue.

    3. PCRA

    Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act is probably one of the most complex areas of criminal law. The time deadlines to file a PCRA petition is much longer than the deadlines to file a post-sentence motion or direct appeal. PCRA petitions must be filed 1 year from the date of the judgment. For example, if a direct appeal is unsuccessful, a PCRA petition may be filed 1 year from the date of the conclusion of the direct appeal.

    There are specific issues which may be raised in a PCRA petition, such as ineffective assistance of counsel or newly discovered evidence. Ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) claims are the most common types of claims raised in PCRA petitions. IAC claims are successful where the evidence shows that the lawyer’s actions were unreasonable and didn’t advance the client’s interests, and the actions caused the client real harm (i.e., made a difference in the outcome of the case).

    Below are two examples of successful IAC claims.

    Example 1: Trial Lawyer Failed to Call Witnesses

    At a criminal trial for assault, the trial lawyer fails to call a witness who would testify that the alleged victim was high on drugs at the time of the assault. The witness would also testify that the victim had a reputation as a liar and had in fact, filed false charges against another individual in the past. The trial lawyer fails to investigate the witness’ story and doesn’t call the witness at trial. The client is convicted of assault. Here, so long as the evidence was sufficient, there would be a valid IAC claim.

    Example 2: Trial Lawyer Failed to Raise a Valid Suppression Issue

    Using the same example above, let’s say that the criminal defendant made a Mirandized (voluntary) statement admitting to the assault at the time of arrest. Police officers arrested the client on the street. The officers roughhoused the client just before he made the statement. Even though the client told the attorney about this, the attorney did nothing. Subsequent video footage from a nearby business shows that the officers did, in fact, roughhouse the client just before the client’s statement. Here, the existence of the video footage supports the client’s version of events, and had the trial lawyer investigated the issue, he would have found the video footage. Therefore, a suppression motion could have been made and the statement may have been thrown out.

    Criminal appellate issues are often very complex and require extensive knowledge of criminal law and trial tactics. If you or a loved one needs help with a criminal appeal in Philadelphia, please call.

    FREE CONSULTATIONS: (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    Last updated: January 6, 2016

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2021)

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Attempted Murder Case – Not Guilty Jury Verdict

    Mr. Nenner presented a self-defense argument, and the jury returned a “not guilty” verdict after a 7 day trial in Philadelphia.

    3rd Degree Murder Case – Charges Dismissed for Co-Defendants

    Mr. Nenner represented co-defendants in a shooting death in North Philadelphia. Both cases were ultimately dismissed.

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...

    Dog Sniff Searches of Cars in Pennsylvania Traffic Stops (Federal Law)

    Dog or canine searches of cars during traffic stops in PA often lead to drug possession/dealing charges and gun charges. For example, a police officer pulls over a driver for speeding. During the traffic stop, a canine search is performed revealing several bags of...

    Federal Drug Dealing Crime Sentencing Law – Mandatory Minimum Sentences Reduced in Phila. Cases

    On December 21, 2018, federal sentencing laws for drug cases were amended significantly. The First Step Act removed the mandatory life sentence for 3 time drug offenders in high quantity drug dealing cases and also reduced the mandatory minimum sentences for 2nd...

    Chester, PA Shootings & Homicides, May 2020

    Homicides and murders are up in both Chester and Philadelphia PA so far in 2020. Murder investigations when homicide rates are high may lead to false confessions.