Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Criminal Appeals Lawyer in Pennsylvania Discusses Raising Issues with Merit

    Presenting a criminal appeal or Post Conviction Relief Act Petition (PCRA) in Pennsylvania requires great skill. For example, reviewing a criminal case for ineffective assistance of counsel claims requires not only reviewing the trial transcript, but also understanding the evidence in the underlying case. In many cases, raising ineffective assistance of counsel claims also requires investigation of additional or new evidence.

    One of the mistakes commonly made in filing appeals or PCRA petitions in PA is the kitchen sink approach. This is where an appeal or petition contains a laundry list of issues for the appellate court to review, everything but the kitchen sink. For example, a person convicted of murder files an appeal and raises every conceivable issue instead of raising the key ones, or the ones with actual merit.

    Pennsylvania Criminal Murder Case Appeal – An Example of the Kitchen Sink Approach

    Commonwealth v. Perez is a 2011 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case where the defendant raised 25 issues on appeal. The case involved the murder of a mother and her young child in Berks County, PA. The defendant was convicted on both counts of murder, and due to aggravating circumstances, he was sentenced to death. In his appeal, he raised multiple issues but failed to substantiate most of them. The court was not impressed, stating:

    Appellant raises twenty-five lettered issues, nearly exhausting the alphabet, and causing us to reiterate that volume does not equal quality. Appellant’s brief is replete with beyond-boilerplate allegations containing sparse argument and even less citation to supporting authority or identification of pertinent portions of the record.

    Why the Kitchen Sink Approach Doesn’t Work

    Under Pennsylvania criminal appellate law, failing to develop legal arguments or cite any legal cases constitutes waiver of the issue. This basically means that throwing boilerplate appellate issues in a criminal appeal without any supporting argument or case law will only hurt the appeal.

    Appellate court judges in Pennsylvania are some of the best and brightest legal minds in the state. They can quickly determine if an appellate issue has merit or not. However, when faced with a kitchen sink appeal, judges are more likely to tune out. The kitchen sink appeal almost certainly guarantees denial of the relief requested.

    In addition, the problem with the kitchen sink approach is that it all but guarantees the denial of real, appealable issues. Basically, the key to a successful appeal is zeroing in on one or two issues and then developing the appeal around those specific issues. This requires poring over the trial record to identify parts of the record to support the appealable issues and if necessary, conducting additional investigation to support the claims.

    Criminal Appeals Lawyer in Pennsylvania

    Our criminal lawyers handle appeals in Pennsylvania. For a free consultation, please call our office at (215) 564-0644.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...