FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    False Confessions in Pennsylvania Criminal Cases

    False Confessions are Nothing New

    False confessions are nothing new and have resulted in scores of convictions across the U.S. How does this happen? The answer is complex and the phenomena of false confessions is explained by the vast differences in socioeconomic differences.

    People who give false confessions are generally undereducated, mentally ill, poor or otherwise susceptible to persuasion. In addition, average citizens simply cannot understand what it is like to be investigated, arrested and/or interrogated. Together, socioeconomic factors and the intense pressure of interrogation explain how and why false confessions occur.

    Related: Philadelphia PA Drug Cases Thrown Out Due to Corruption in Philadelphia’s Police Department

    The Intense Pressure of Police Interrogation

    Police interrogation is probably one of the most difficult things to explain to a lay person. Movies and television shows do nothing to truly explain just how intense police interrogation really is from a mental and psychological standpoint. In the movies or on TV, police interrogations literally last 2-5 minutes. That’s only a fraction of time compared to how long interrogations actually last, which is hours on end. Try sitting handcuffed to a chair in a small room with menacing-looking officers who repeatedly tell you that you are guilty and that they have enough evidence to get a conviction. At some point, everyone is susceptible to breaking down.

    Police interrogations involve a 2 step process. First, officers will try to convince the suspect or person being interrogated that they have been caught and that there is enough evidence to support a conviction. Officers will then try to convince the individual that the only way out is to confess to the crime.

    How Does Someone Confess to a Crime They Didn’t Commit?

    There are two kinds of false confessions, a false confession in which the suspect actually lies and a false confession given by a suspect who actually believes they are guilty, when they in fact are not guilty.

    False Confessions – The Suspect Lies

    In these types of false confessions, the suspect is basically coerced into confessing. The individual lies in order to literally put an end to the interrogation. Individuals with mental disabilities and those who are mentally ill may be inclined to give false confessions.

    Just this past year in a murder trial in Philadelphia, the defendant confessed to the crimes and was ultimately found not guilty by the jury. The jury ultimately believed that his confession was false. See Commonwealth v. Pinkney.

    False Confessions – The Suspect Believes Their Guilt

    In these types of false confessions, the suspect believes in their own guilt. Basically, the individual believes that they committed the crime but has no memory of it.

    Consider another high profile case of Kevin Fox, a young father who falsely confessed to the rape and murder of his young daughter. Physical evidence later showed that the father had nothing to do with the crime. He spent 8 months in prison after his false confession; he’d been led to believe that he could have committed the crime without remembering/knowing he’d done it. The perpetrator was a neighbor who left physical evidence at the scene, including DNA evidence which clearly exonerated the young father.

    Related: David Nenner Criminal Case Result & Analysis: Acquittal in an Attempted Murder Case in Philadelphia

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer – Free Case Reviews

    Please contact our office for a free case review. David Nenner has been representing citizens in Philadelphia for over 20 years. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...