Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Can You Lose Your House if a Relative Sells Drugs? Pennsylvania’s Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act

    Pennsylvania’s Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act (Act) has received quite a bit of media attention. This is due to a recent lawsuit filed last month (August 2014) by a nonprofit group. The lawsuit alleges that the Act is unconstitutional.

    Related: PA Supreme Court Makes Sweeping Changes to Search-Seizure Law in PA Drug-Gun Cases

    Background of the Act

    Passed in 1988, the law was designed to make it harder for citizens in Pennsylvania to sell drugs. Under the law, the police can seize money, cash, cars, and other property like guns, etc. In addition, the law allows the police/District Attorney’s office to seize a house or other real property, if there is evidence of a nexus or connection between the drug dealing and the house.

    The following example shows how the Act works. An adult child living in his parent’s home sells drugs out of the home. He is arrested and convicted of the crime. The police and DA’s office move to seize the parent’s home. Even if the parent has no actual knowledge of the drug dealing, the home can still be seized and forfeited. The parent will be kicked out of the home and could literally lose it. This scenario is quite common in Philadelphia County.

    Related: Criminal Charges for Selling Marijuana in Pennsylvania – Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    Financial Motives for Prosecutor Offices and Police Departments

    The lawsuit alleges that the police and DA’s office in Philadelphia County conduct a disproportionate number of home seizures, to the tune of nearly $6 million dollars each year. That money is then split between the police department and the DA’s office and provides funding for salaries, drug investigations, etc.

    The Actual Effects – Poor and Immigrants Suffer the Most

    The Act spells out vague procedures for forfeiture actions. While the Act sufficiently details how notice of a forfeiture action must be given, the rest of the law detailing the procedures is sparse. The procedure for forfeiture actions is only one statute and that’s it. Procedures for other types of actions are laid out in literally dozens of statutes.

    The problem with the forfeiture law is that it doesn’t describe the procedure for the court hearings and how they are scheduled, and most importantly, whether and when the person whose property is being seized must be notified that they have a right to a jury trial. Without these key details, the law places a great deal of power in the hands of those who are seeking to take the property, the DA’s office and police.

    There are reports that the initial notice is insufficient, and that multiple hearings are scheduled in a given case. These problems disproportionately affect the poor and immigrants. For example, using the example above, the parent is a poor immigrant who doesn’t speak English well. With multiple hearing dates, the odds of missing a hearing are good. If the parent misses a hearing, the forfeiture action may be decided against them, and they may lose the home.

    Related: David Nenner Secures Acquittals in Two Attempted Murder Cases in Philadelphia

    Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer

    David S. Nenner is a criminal lawyer with over 2 decades of experience handling all criminal matters, including drug/gun cases, murder/homicide cases, appeals/PCRA and civil forfeitures. Please call for a free case review. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...