FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Lost a Criminal Trial in Philadelphia? What to Know About Pennsylvania’s Post-Trial (Criminal) Procedures

    Philadelphia criminal cases often result in trials; that’s due to a relatively low conviction rate for the local District Attorney’s office. Philadelphia has one of the lowest conviction rates in the country. This means that many residents of Philadelphia who are facing criminal charges will take their chances with a trial. But what happens if you lose at trial?

    This article will discuss post-sentence procedures which allow a person convicted of a crime in Philadelphia to challenge the court’s sentence.

    Related: PA Criminal Appeals Law, Filing a Direct Appeal After a Trial

    Post-Sentence Motions

    Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure, Post-Trial Procedures, Rule 720, lays out the procedure for filing post-sentence motions.

    Section (B) provides the grounds or claims which may be raised in any post-sentence motions:

    • challenging the validity of a guilty plea or no contest plea,
    • challenging a trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal,
    • requesting a new trial, or
    • modifying a sentence.

    As a general rule, post-sentence motions are successful when crafted carefully by an experienced criminal trial/appeals lawyer. Trial courts will not simply entertain and rehash issues which were resolved at trial. Rather, trial courts are more inclined to take post-sentence motions seriously when they involve a grave error such as an illegal sentence, or one that is not allowed under Pennsylvania law. In addition, post-sentence motions are more likely to succeed if they involve new case law, new evidence, or new circumstances.

    It is important to note that ineffective assistance of counsel claims are not appropriate for post-sentence motions. Read about filing ineffective assistance of counsel claims in PCRA (Post Conviction Relief Act) petitions.

    Post-Sentence Motion for a New Trial Based on After-Discovered Evidence

    Subsection (C) allows a defendant to file a post-sentence motion for a new trial based on the discovery of after-discovered evidence (i.e., evidence which was not discovered despite due diligence until after trial). Subsection (C) provides:

    A post-sentence motion for a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence must be filed in writing promptly after such discovery.

    Per the rule, any new evidence which is uncovered during the post-sentencing phase must be raised with the trial court.

    Time to File Post-Sentence Motions in Pennsylvania Criminal Cases

    Rule 720 only gives defendants a short window of time within which to file a post-sentence motion, and that is 10 days from the imposition of the sentence, which is basically the date of the sentencing order.

    The 10 day window does not apply to post-sentence motions based on after-discovered evidence. Subsection (C) does not provide any specific time limit and only requires that claims of after-discovered evidence be raised “promptly.” Therefore, after-discovered evidence uncovered during the post-sentence stage must be raised with the trial judge. After-discovered evidenceuncovered during the direct appeal process must be raised during the appeal process, and after-discovered evidence uncovered during the PCRA period must be raised in a PCRA petition.

    It is important to note that filing a post-sentence motion stalls the time to file an appeal. If a defendant does not file a post-sentence motion, the standard 30 day time limit applies. If a defendant does file a post-sentence motion, the 30 day window is stalled, depending on what happens to the post-sentence motion. For instance, if a trial court denies a post-sentence motion, the clock starts ticking on the 30 day window for filing an appeal on the date the order denying the post-sentence motion is entered.

    Criminal Appeals Lawyer in Philadelphia

    Our criminal lawyers handle appeals in Philadelphia. For a free consultation, please call our office at (215) 564-0644.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...