Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Lost a Criminal Trial in Philadelphia? What to Know About Pennsylvania’s Post-Trial (Criminal) Procedures

    Philadelphia criminal cases often result in trials; that’s due to a relatively low conviction rate for the local District Attorney’s office. Philadelphia has one of the lowest conviction rates in the country. This means that many residents of Philadelphia who are facing criminal charges will take their chances with a trial. But what happens if you lose at trial?

    This article will discuss post-sentence procedures which allow a person convicted of a crime in Philadelphia to challenge the court’s sentence.

    Related: PA Criminal Appeals Law, Filing a Direct Appeal After a Trial

    Post-Sentence Motions

    Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure, Post-Trial Procedures, Rule 720, lays out the procedure for filing post-sentence motions.

    Section (B) provides the grounds or claims which may be raised in any post-sentence motions:

    • challenging the validity of a guilty plea or no contest plea,
    • challenging a trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal,
    • requesting a new trial, or
    • modifying a sentence.

    As a general rule, post-sentence motions are successful when crafted carefully by an experienced criminal trial/appeals lawyer. Trial courts will not simply entertain and rehash issues which were resolved at trial. Rather, trial courts are more inclined to take post-sentence motions seriously when they involve a grave error such as an illegal sentence, or one that is not allowed under Pennsylvania law. In addition, post-sentence motions are more likely to succeed if they involve new case law, new evidence, or new circumstances.

    It is important to note that ineffective assistance of counsel claims are not appropriate for post-sentence motions. Read about filing ineffective assistance of counsel claims in PCRA (Post Conviction Relief Act) petitions.

    Post-Sentence Motion for a New Trial Based on After-Discovered Evidence

    Subsection (C) allows a defendant to file a post-sentence motion for a new trial based on the discovery of after-discovered evidence (i.e., evidence which was not discovered despite due diligence until after trial). Subsection (C) provides:

    A post-sentence motion for a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence must be filed in writing promptly after such discovery.

    Per the rule, any new evidence which is uncovered during the post-sentencing phase must be raised with the trial court.

    Time to File Post-Sentence Motions in Pennsylvania Criminal Cases

    Rule 720 only gives defendants a short window of time within which to file a post-sentence motion, and that is 10 days from the imposition of the sentence, which is basically the date of the sentencing order.

    The 10 day window does not apply to post-sentence motions based on after-discovered evidence. Subsection (C) does not provide any specific time limit and only requires that claims of after-discovered evidence be raised “promptly.” Therefore, after-discovered evidence uncovered during the post-sentence stage must be raised with the trial judge. After-discovered evidenceuncovered during the direct appeal process must be raised during the appeal process, and after-discovered evidence uncovered during the PCRA period must be raised in a PCRA petition.

    It is important to note that filing a post-sentence motion stalls the time to file an appeal. If a defendant does not file a post-sentence motion, the standard 30 day time limit applies. If a defendant does file a post-sentence motion, the 30 day window is stalled, depending on what happens to the post-sentence motion. For instance, if a trial court denies a post-sentence motion, the clock starts ticking on the 30 day window for filing an appeal on the date the order denying the post-sentence motion is entered.

    Criminal Appeals Lawyer in Philadelphia

    Our criminal lawyers handle appeals in Philadelphia. For a free consultation, please call our office at (215) 564-0644.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Attempted Murder Case – Not Guilty Jury Verdict

    Mr. Nenner presented a self-defense argument, and the jury returned a “not guilty” verdict after a 7 day trial in Philadelphia.

    3rd Degree Murder Case – Charges Dismissed for Co-Defendants

    Mr. Nenner represented co-defendants in a shooting death in North Philadelphia. Both cases were ultimately dismissed.

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...

    Dog Sniff Searches of Cars in Pennsylvania Traffic Stops (Federal Law)

    Dog or canine searches of cars during traffic stops in PA often lead to drug possession/dealing charges and gun charges. For example, a police officer pulls over a driver for speeding. During the traffic stop, a canine search is performed revealing several bags of...

    Federal Drug Dealing Crime Sentencing Law – Mandatory Minimum Sentences Reduced in Phila. Cases

    On December 21, 2018, federal sentencing laws for drug cases were amended significantly. The First Step Act removed the mandatory life sentence for 3 time drug offenders in high quantity drug dealing cases and also reduced the mandatory minimum sentences for 2nd...

    Chester, PA Shootings & Homicides, May 2020

    Homicides and murders are up in both Chester and Philadelphia PA so far in 2020. Murder investigations when homicide rates are high may lead to false confessions.

    Attempted Murder & Conspiracy to Commit Murder Charges in Pennsylvania Shooting Cases

    Many residents of Philadelphia and nearby counties like Delaware County or Chester County face criminal cases due to a shooting. In this legal article, our criminal law firm provides legal info on attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder, two common charges in...