Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    My criminal lawyer in Philadelphia made mistakes which got me convicted. What are my rights?

    Criminal cases in Pennsylvania, especially those involving appeals or Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petitions, are very complex. There are time deadlines what must be compiled with. An appeal or petition filed too late will almost certainly be dismissed.

    There are two deadlines which apply to any criminal conviction in Philadelphia. For a direct appeal, a criminal defendant has 30 days after the conviction is entered (i.e., the sentencing order is entered by the court clerk). For a PCRA petition, a criminal defendant has 1 year from the date the judgement being complained of is entered. These time limits are pretty stringent and have VERY limited exceptions. Therefore, in the vast majority of cases, filing the appeal or petition after the deadline means the case gets dismissed.

    That’s why it is critical to have an experienced and knowledgeable criminal lawyer meet with you, review the case and trial transcripts, if necessary, to determine whether you have a valid appeal or PCRA petition.

    It’s important to note that in some cases, a post-sentence motion may be filed. This is not the same as an appeal or a PCRA petition. A post-sentence motion in a criminal case in PA raises issues such as legal challenges to a guilty plea or asks a court to modify a sentence. However, the time deadline is much shorter–10 days from the date the sentencing order is entered.

    Appeals and PCRA petitions are different in terms of approach, legal issues and procedure. In terms of grounds or legal issues which can be raised, the most successful appeals raise an issue related to a judicial ruling at trial or some irregularity at trial that had an effect on the outcome. For example, a successful criminal appeal in a drug case might argue that the trial judge failed to suppress evidence or made a mistake in ruling on the admissibility of evidence at trial.

    In terms of grounds of appeal in PCRA petitions, the most successful cases raise issues related to ineffective assistance of counsel, which will be discussed below. Click the link for a discussion about the differences between a criminal appeal and a PCRA petition.

    Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (IAC)

    Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are one of the most common claims raised in PCRA petitions in Philadelphia. The 6th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to a reasonably competent lawyer. An individual who was convicted of a crime because his or her lawyer who was ineffective may be able to get relief, i.e., a hearing, by proving that the lawyer made a mistake and that the mistake had a negative impact on the outcome of the case, i.e., conviction. In other words, there must be evidence that the criminal lawyer’s mistake actually affected the outcome.

    The most probable outcome of a PCRA petition is an evidentiary hearing where the court heard evidence on the claim and then makes a decision on whether further action should be taken, such as a new trial or new sentencing hearing.

    Get a Legal Review of Your Philadelphia Criminal Appeal or PCRA Petition

    Contact our legal team for a free consultation in your criminal case. Attorney David Nenner has handled countless criminal defense cases, including PCRA petitions and direct appeals. Time is of the essence. Act now.  (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...