Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Pennsylvania PCRA Petition and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing (Part 1)

    When a defendant files a PCRA petition after being convicted at trial, whether it is for murder, capital murder or robbery, they may request an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Pennsylvania law. 42 Pa.C.S. Section 9545(d) Evidentiary hearing, provides:

    (1) Where a petitioner requests an evidentiary hearing, the petition shall include a signed certification as to each intended witness stating the witness’s name, address, date of birth and substance of testimony and shall include any documents material to that witness’s testimony. Failure to substantially comply with the requirements of this paragraph shall render the proposed witness’s testimony inadmissible.

    (2) No discovery, at any stage of proceedings under this subchapter, shall be permitted except upon leave of court with a showing of exceptional circumstances.

    (3) When a claim for relief is based on an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel as a ground for relief, any privilege concerning counsel’s representation as to that issue shall be automatically terminated. An evidentiary hearing is essentially a hearing where the court hears and considers evidence to make a legal decision.   In the context of a PCRA petition, the court would decide on whether to grant the petition based on the ground(s) of appeal raised in the petition.

    An evidentiary hearing is often requested when the issue of appeal is ineffective assistance of counsel, which is a commonly raised issue in a PCRA petition.

    Related: PA PCRA Petition – Can You Appeal an Attempted Murder Conviction Due to a Lawyer’s Inexperience?

    Simply put, a defendant who raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is alleging that the lawyer was ineffective at some time before, during or after trial. If the trial lawyer was effective during trial, then the defendant would not have been convicted.

    In general, a defendant’s trial counsel is presumed to be effective. Therefore, a defendant filing a PCRA due to ineffective assistance of counsel has the burden to prove that their lawyer was ineffective at trial and must satisfy a 3 prong test:

    1. the claim of ineffectiveness of counsel has arguable merit;

    2. defense counsel had no reasonable basis for the act or omission in question; and

    3. the defendant was prejudiced by the defense counsel’s actions, i.e., but for his counsel’s acts or omissions, the result of the trial would have been different.

    It is important to note that a defendant does not have an absolute right to an evidentiary hearing. A hearing shall be granted if the petition raises material issues of fact. The PA Supreme Court has held that “where it is clear that allegations of ineffectiveness are baseless or meritless then an evidentiary hearing is unnecessary and the unfounded allegations should be rejected and dismissed.” Commonwealth v. Clemmons, 505 Pa. 356, 361 (1984).

    However, if a hearing is granted for a PCRA petition based on ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial attorney is often ordered to testify as a witness at the hearing and answer questions, such as why they made certain decisions at trial, failed to object to evidence that may not have been admissible, etc.

    Click here to continue to part 2 of the article which discusses when a court may grant an evidentiary hearing.

    FREE Consultations- Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer PCRA & Appeals

    If you or a loved one is considering filing a PCRA petition after a murder conviction in the Philadelphia area, please contact our office for a FREE case evaluation. Our criminal defense lawyers are experienced trial and appellate lawyers. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    Not guilty on 1st Degree MURDER CHARGE (dec. 2022, Pottsville, Pa)

    Mr. Nenner's client faced first degree murder, third degree murder and various other charges. The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Whitted stabbed and killed a driver after an incident at a red light in West Brunswick Township. Throughout the trial, Mr. Nenner argued...

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.