FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Pennsylvania PCRA Petition and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing (Part 1)

    When a defendant files a PCRA petition after being convicted at trial, whether it is for murder, capital murder or robbery, they may request an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Pennsylvania law. 42 Pa.C.S. Section 9545(d) Evidentiary hearing, provides:

    (1) Where a petitioner requests an evidentiary hearing, the petition shall include a signed certification as to each intended witness stating the witness’s name, address, date of birth and substance of testimony and shall include any documents material to that witness’s testimony. Failure to substantially comply with the requirements of this paragraph shall render the proposed witness’s testimony inadmissible.

    (2) No discovery, at any stage of proceedings under this subchapter, shall be permitted except upon leave of court with a showing of exceptional circumstances.

    (3) When a claim for relief is based on an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel as a ground for relief, any privilege concerning counsel’s representation as to that issue shall be automatically terminated. An evidentiary hearing is essentially a hearing where the court hears and considers evidence to make a legal decision.   In the context of a PCRA petition, the court would decide on whether to grant the petition based on the ground(s) of appeal raised in the petition.

    An evidentiary hearing is often requested when the issue of appeal is ineffective assistance of counsel, which is a commonly raised issue in a PCRA petition.

    Related: PA PCRA Petition – Can You Appeal an Attempted Murder Conviction Due to a Lawyer’s Inexperience?

    Simply put, a defendant who raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is alleging that the lawyer was ineffective at some time before, during or after trial. If the trial lawyer was effective during trial, then the defendant would not have been convicted.

    In general, a defendant’s trial counsel is presumed to be effective. Therefore, a defendant filing a PCRA due to ineffective assistance of counsel has the burden to prove that their lawyer was ineffective at trial and must satisfy a 3 prong test:

    1. the claim of ineffectiveness of counsel has arguable merit;

    2. defense counsel had no reasonable basis for the act or omission in question; and

    3. the defendant was prejudiced by the defense counsel’s actions, i.e., but for his counsel’s acts or omissions, the result of the trial would have been different.

    It is important to note that a defendant does not have an absolute right to an evidentiary hearing. A hearing shall be granted if the petition raises material issues of fact. The PA Supreme Court has held that “where it is clear that allegations of ineffectiveness are baseless or meritless then an evidentiary hearing is unnecessary and the unfounded allegations should be rejected and dismissed.” Commonwealth v. Clemmons, 505 Pa. 356, 361 (1984).

    However, if a hearing is granted for a PCRA petition based on ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial attorney is often ordered to testify as a witness at the hearing and answer questions, such as why they made certain decisions at trial, failed to object to evidence that may not have been admissible, etc.

    Click here to continue to part 2 of the article which discusses when a court may grant an evidentiary hearing.

    FREE Consultations- Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer PCRA & Appeals

    If you or a loved one is considering filing a PCRA petition after a murder conviction in the Philadelphia area, please contact our office for a FREE case evaluation. Our criminal defense lawyers are experienced trial and appellate lawyers. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...