Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) Petition – Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (IAC) During Plea Bargaining

    Last updated: October 19, 2021

    Defendants in Philadelphia criminal cases who are convicted of a crime in Pennsylvania may file a Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition to appeal the conviction. PCRA petitions are not the same as direct appeals; rather, they are an indirect method of appeal in criminal cases.

    A defendant can file a direct appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, where he/she is convicted, to the Superior Court.  A PCRA petition is an indirect appeal, essentially asking the court to reconsider the accused’s conviction after a direct appeal to the Superior Court was unsuccessful.

    However, a defendant can also file a PCRA petition after he/she is convicted of a crime in the Court of Common Pleas.  They do not have to file a direct appeal before filing a PCRA petition.

    Criminal appeal cases accepted in Philadelphia, Delaware County, Chester County, Montgomery County & Scranton/Lackawanna County. FREE CONSULTATIONS (215) 564-0644

    42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9541 et. seq. specifically spells out when convicted defendants may file PCRA petitions, and some of the limited grounds for appeal include:

    • ineffective assistance of counsel
    • prosecutorial misconduct (i.e., a Brady violation)
    • unlawful guilty plea
    • newly discovered evidence
    • an illegal sentence (i.e., falls outside the maximum allowed under Pennsylvania law)

    For a discussion on some of these claims, see What Claims can be made in a Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act Petition?

    Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (IAC) During Plea Bargaining

    Ineffective assistance of counsel is when the defense attorney’s performance falls below an objective standard of reasonableness when representing his/her client.  There are many different ways a criminal defense lawyer can be ineffective, and this article will address when a lawyer is ineffective during the plea bargaining process.

    Before a criminal case goes to trial or during trial, the prosecutor and the defendant, under his/her lawyer’s guidance may enter into a plea bargain.  For example, if the defendant is charged with multiple charges, the prosecutor may drop some of the charges if the defendant pleads guilty to one of the charges or pleads guilty to the original charge in return of a more lenient sentence as opposed to the mandatory sentence.  When the prosecutor and the defendant enter into a plea bargain, a criminal trial is avoided, thus eliminating the risk of defendant being convicted at trial for a more serious charge.  When the prosecutor offers a plea, the defendant’s lawyer must explain what the offer means and provide advice to the defendant.

    Consider the following scenario: A defendant is charged with Possession with Intent to Deliver (PWID).  The DA’s office offers a plea, with a sentence less harsh than the mandatory sentencing.  Defendant’s lawyer fails to inform him of the favorable plea offer, and a jury finds him guilty of PWID.  He later receives a sentence much harsher than the plea bargain.

    In this situation, the defendant may file a PCRA petition for his counsel’s ineffective assistance during the plea bargaining process.

    Related: PA Criminal Appeals Law – The Basics of Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act Part 2

    Pennsylvania Criminal Lawyer PCRA & Appeals – FREE Consultations

    The Nenner Law Firm handles PCRA petitions and appeals. If you have questions about filing a PCRA petition relating to ineffective assistance of counsel, it is important to talk to an experienced criminal defense trial lawyer who has experience handling PCRA petitions and appeals.

    Firm founder David Nenner has over 30 years of criminal trial experience. Call (215) 564-0644 for a free consultation.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...