FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    PA Post Conviction Relief Act Petition – How to Prove Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

    After being convicted of a crime (murder, attempted murder, gun charges, etc.) at trial in Philadelphia, a defendant may file a Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition to appeal their conviction.

    However, there are limited grounds for appeal pursuant to 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9541 et. seq.   Some of those grounds include:

    • ineffective assistance of counsel
    • prosecutorial misconduct
    • unlawful guilty plea
    • newly discovered evidence
    • an illegal sentence

    Related: Pennsylvania PCRA Law: The Basics of Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act

    Related: Pennsylvania PCRA Law: The Basics of Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act – See more at: https://nennerlaw.com/brady-new-evidence-pa-1-year-pcra-time-law/#sthash.musHkG7a.dpuf

    Related: Pennsylvania PCRA Law: The Basics of Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act – See more at: https://nennerlaw.com/brady-new-evidence-pa-1-year-pcra-time-law/#sthash.musHkG7a.dpuf

    Related: Pennsylvania PCRA Law: The Basics of Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act – See more at: https://nennerlaw.com/brady-new-evidence-pa-1-year-pcra-time-law/#sthash.musHkG7a.dpuf
    Brady Violations & Newly Discovered Evidence – Exceptions to Pennsylvania’s 1 Year PCRA Petition Law – See more at: https://nennerlaw.com/brady-new-evidence-pa-1-year-pcra-time-law/#sthash.musHkG7a.dpuf
    Brady Violations & Newly Discovered Evidence – Exceptions to Pennsylvania’s 1 Year PCRA Petition Law – See more at: https://nennerlaw.com/category/pa-nj-criminal-appeals-pcra/#sthash.H3XfmayO.dpuf
    Brady Violations & Newly Discovered Evidence – Exceptions to Pennsylvania’s 1 Year PCRA Petition Law – See more at: https://nennerlaw.com/category/pa-nj-criminal-appeals-pcra/#sthash.H3XfmayO.dpuf

    One of the most common grounds for filing PCRA petitions is ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC).

    When defendants want to file PCRA petitions alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, their lawyers are presumed to be effective. Therefore, defendants have the burden to prove that their lawyers were ineffective.

    In order to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, defendants must meet a three-prong test:

    1. the claim of ineffectiveness of counsel has arguable merit;

    2. defense counsel’s act was not reasonably designed to advance the interest of the defendant; and

    3. the defendant was prejudiced by the defense counsel’s actions, i.e., but for his counsel’s actions, the result of the trial would have been different.

    What is Arguable Merit?

    A defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim has arguable merit if his lawyer’s act or failure to act conflicts with a statute, constitution or rule of procedure.

    An IAC claim may also have arguable merit if defense counsel ignored available and admissible evidence tending to establish a viable defense. For instance, if there was admissible evidence that would have established a defendant’s innocence but the defendant’s lawyer ignored the evidence, then a defendant’s IAC claim has arguable merit.

    Was the Defense Counsel’s Act/Omission Reasonable?

    The second prong the defendant has to prove is that his lawyer’s decision was unreasonable. The fact that a lawyer’s strategy to present a case was unsuccessful does not render his representation ineffective. However, the decision for a specific strategy should be explained to the defendant. The defendant should know how his lawyer will defend his case. It is unreasonable if the act in question was not explained to his client.

    Further, a lawyer’s action is also unreasonable if no competent lawyer would have chosen to do it.

    What is Prejudice?

    Prejudice is established where a petitioner/defendant demonstrates that but for the errors and omissions of counsel, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different. In other words, the lawyer’s act or omission had an adverse effect on the outcome of the proceeding.

    Pennsylvania Criminal Lawyer PCRA & Appeals – FREE Consultations

    Nenner Law Firm handles PCRA petitions and appeals. Firm founder David Nenner has nearly 3 decades of criminal trial experience.  Call (215) 564-0644 for a free consultation.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.