Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    PCRA Petition – Do You Have an Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim?

    FAQ: My fiancé was convicted of attempted murder in Philadelphia and has been in jail for the last 2 months. We feel that his lawyer did not do a good job in representing him. There were people that would have testified for my boyfriend who were not called as witnesses. How can we determine whether my fiancé’s lawyer knew what he was doing? Can we file an appeal to overturn the conviction if his lawyer was incompetent?

    Answer: Your fiancé may be able to file a PCRA petition to appeal his conviction. If you feel that his lawyer was incompetent, it is possible that your fiancé may have an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, which is one of the top issues raised in PCRA petitions. However, it is important to stress that we cannot properly assess whether there is a viable ineffective assistance of counsel claim without reading the entire trial transcript and talking to your fiancé. His lawyer may have had a reasonable basis for not calling certain people as witnesses.

    Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

    Defendants in Philadelphia criminal cases have a right to a competent criminal defense lawyer. When a criminal defense lawyer does not provide competent counsel, a defendant may be convicted of a crime. As a result, the defendant may file a PCRA petition raising an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, which is defined as:

    Ineffective assistance of counsel which, in the circumstances of the particular case, so undermined the truth-determining process that no reliable adjudication of guilt or innocence could have taken place.

    See Post Conviction Relief Act Section 9543(a)(2)(ii).

    An ineffective assistance of counsel claim will only be successful in a PCRA petition if a defendant can prove the following:

    • the claim has arguable merit;
    • counsel did not have a reasonable basis for the act or omission; and
    • the defendant was prejudiced by his counsel’s actions i.e., the defendant would not have been convicted of a crime but for his counsel’s action or omission.

    Some examples of how trial counsel is ineffective include, but are not limited to, failing to object during trial, failing to advise a defendant of his right to appeal, failing to present evidence at trial, failing to request a certain jury instruction or failing to present mitigating evidence at sentencing.

    There is a deadline for when defendants can file PCRA petitions, which is within a year from the date the judgment becomes final.

    Related FAQ: What are PCRA Petitions and When to File? By a Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

    We offer FREE consultations. PCRA petitions and appeals are very complicated. It is best to talk to an experienced criminal defense lawyer who has handled appeals and PCRA petitions. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...