Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    PCRA Petitions – Filing Subsequent Petitions – By a Phila. Criminal Defense Lawyer

    When defendants are convicted of crimes, such as murder, attempted murder or gun and drugs related charges in Philadelphia, they have the right to appeal their convictions. There are different types of appeals, such as direct appeals and Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petitions.

    A defendant must file a direct appeal within 30 days of the date the sentencing order is entered, or 30 days from the date of the conviction. If a direct appeal is unsuccessful, a defendant may file a PCRA petition within 1 year from the date of the direct appeal’s decision. However, a PCRA petition may be filed without filing a direct appeal first. Therefore, if a defendant does not file a direct appeal, he must file the PCRA petition within 1 year from the date of judgement, i.e., 1 year from the date of sentencing.

    Related: PA Criminal Appeals Law – The Basics of Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act

    Typically, when defendants’ direct appeals are denied, they will then file PCRA petitions. What if the defendants’ PCRA petitions are unsuccessful? Can they file another petition to appeal the decision? The answer is yes. Defendants may file subsequent PCRA petition(s); however, they may only do so if the issues raised in subsequent petitions meet certain legal requirements.   This article will discuss when the courts allow defendants to file subsequent PCRA petitions.


    In the 1980s the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had to rule on several cases that dealt with subsequent or repetitive PCRA petitions. In Commonwealth v. Watlington, the PA Supreme Court reversed the dismissal of a second PCRA petition filed by the defendant that included claims not raised in the first PCRA petition.

    Per Pennsylvania criminal law, defendants may file PCRA petitions if they establish that the allegation of error or issue has not been waived. A claim is waived if the defendant could have raised the issue at trial, on appeal or in a prior post conviction proceeding but failed to do so.

    In Watlington, though the issues in the second PCRA petition were not raised in the first PCRA, the court went on to say that the claims in the second petition were not waived because the defendant alleged that the first post conviction counsel was ineffective for failing to raise claims. As such, the claim could not have been raised in the first petition. The court found that ineffectiveness of counsel was an extraordinary circumstance that excused the waiver.

    However, the dissent in Watlington argued the court should adopt a standard to consider a second or subsequent petition only if the petition raised a due process claim that affected the outcome of the case.

    It was not until Commonwealth v. Lawson, that the court provided a standard in permitting second or subsequent PCRA petitions. The court held that, “a second or any subsequent post-conviction request for relief will not be entertained unless a strong prima facie showing is offered to demonstrate that a miscarriage of justice might have occurred.”

    The defendant must satisfy the Lawson standard before the court will consider whether other requirements for relief have been met under PCRA Section 9543. See Legal Analysis of Pennsylvania’s Post-Conviction Relief Act, Section 9543

    When Should Subsequent PCRA Petitions Be Filed?

    Under PA criminal law, subsequent PCRA petitions still need to be filed within one year of when the underlying judgement becomes final.

    Section 9545 of the PCRA provides:

    (b)  Time for filing petition.–

    (1)  Any petition under this subchapter, including a second or subsequent petition, shall be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final, unless the petition alleges and the petitioner proves that:

    (i)  the failure to raise the claim previously was the result of interference by government officials with the presentation of the claim in violation of the Constitution or laws of this Commonwealth or the Constitution or laws of the United States;

    (ii)  the facts upon which the claim is predicated were unknown to the petitioner and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence; or

    (iii)  the right asserted is a constitutional right that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States or the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania after the time period provided in this section and has been held by that court to apply retroactively.

    (2)  Any petition invoking an exception provided in paragraph (1) shall be filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.

    There are limited exceptions to the PCRA’s requirement that all petitions be filed within 1 year. Stay tuned for articles discussing this issue in the coming months.

    About Our Criminal Appeals Practice

    Our lawyers pride themselves on being criminal trial lawyers, and they specialize in direct appeals and PCRA petitions. Oftentimes, the success of an appeal or PCRA petition depends on the lawyers’ expertise. Call for a free consultation. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.