FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Pennsylvania Criminal Appeals – Weight of the Evidence Claims (Rule 607)

    Pennsylvania criminal appeals are very complex. Given the strict time deadlines for filing an appeal (30 days from the day the sentencing order is entered by the clerk), the issues to be raised in the appeal must be streamlined. There simply isn’t enough time to investigate a new issue, theory or defense.

    One of the most common issues raised in an appeal is a weight of the evidence challenge, which is often confused with a sufficiency of the evidence challenge. Read more about sufficiency of the evidence challenges in criminal appeals in Pennsylvania.

    Weight of the Evidence – Not a Question of Enough Evidence, But the Meaning of the Evidence

    A claim that a verdict is against the weight of the evidence essentially concedes that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. The issue is the weight or meaning of the evidence. Was there contrary evidence? If so, how strong was the evidence? Mere conflicts in testimony or issues with the credibility of a witness are not enough.

    More: PA Criminal Appeals Law, Filing a Direct Appeal After a Trial

    Time to Raise a Weight of the Evidence Challenge

    Rule 607 makes it clear that a challenge to the weight of the evidence MUST be raised with the trial judge or it will be considered waived.

    Rule 607. Challenges to the Weight of the Evidence.

    (A) A claim that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence shall be raised with the trial judge in a motion for a new trial:

    (1) orally, on the record, at any time before sentencing;

    (2) by written motion at any time before sentencing; or

    (3) in a post-sentence motion.

    (B) (1) If the claim is raised before sentencing, the judge shall decide the motion before imposing sentence, and shall not extend the date for sentencing or otherwise delay the sentencing proceeding in order to dispose of the motion.

    (2) An appeal from a disposition pursuant to this paragraph shall be governed by the timing requirements of Rule 720(A)(2) or (3), whichever applies.

    Standard of Review for Weight of the Evidence Challenges

    When entertaining a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence, a trial court is called on to determine whether, “notwithstanding all the facts, certain facts are so clearly of greater weight that to ignore them or to give them equal weight with all the facts is to deny justice.” Commonwealth v. Brown, (PA Supreme Court, 1994)

    When an appeals court reviews a weight of the evidence claim, assuming it was not waived, the key issue is the trial judge’s exercise of discretion. It is well settled that in Pennsylvania, the standard of review for a weight of the evidence claim is whether the trial judge abused his or her discretion in upholding the verdict, i.e., finding that the verdict was NOT against the weight of the evidence. In general, a new trial is usually warranted when the verdict was so contrary to all of the evidence that it shocks the conscience or one’s sense of justice.

    Top Rated Criminal Lawyer in Philadelphia – Free Consultations (215) 564-0644

    David Nenner is a Super Lawyers rated criminal lawyer who handles criminal appeals throughout the Southeastern Pennsylvania area. Call for a free consultation.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

     

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.