Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Pennsylvania PCRA Law: Are You Entitled to an Evidentiary Hearing?

    One of the most common questions our criminal appeals lawyers get when speaking to a criminal defendant about a potential Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition is whether they will be able to obtain an evidentiary hearing. The answer depends on the facts and circumstances of the case and basis for the PCRA petition. Download a copy of the Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act here.

    As a preliminary matter, a PCRA court will not even review the issues raised in a PCRA petition unless the petition was filed within the strict time limitations imposed under Section 9545(b) of the Act. Assuming the petition was filed on time, a petitioner is eligible for relief if it is shown that the conviction or sentence resulted from one of the errors/defects listed in Section 9543(a)(2). The petitioner must also show that the issues raised in the PCRA petition have not been previously litigated or waived, as required by Section 9543(a)(3).

    Are You Entitled to an Evidentiary Hearing on a PCRA Petition?

    In a recent (December 2015) case, the Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld the dismissal of a PCRA petition without an evidentiary hearing on the grounds that the underlying claim lacked merit. In Commonwealth v. Hawkins (December 2, 2015, Pennsylvania Superior Court), the petitioner appealed the dismissal of his PCRA petition, arguing that 1. his criminal attorney was ineffective, and 2. he should have been granted an evidentiary hearing.

    The petitioner argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate/call an alibi witness. The Superior Court found that the petition failed to meet the requirements for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on the failure to call a witness. In this case, the court found that the petitioner failed to establish that the witness was willing and able to testify.

    The court also upheld dismissal of the petition without an evidentiary hearing. Under Pennsylvania PCRA law, there is no absolute right to an evidentiary hearing. See Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 907. If the PCRA court determines that there are no genuine issues of material fact, it can deny relief without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Also, it is entirely up to the PCRA court’s discretion to decline to hold a hearing if the claim is frivolous or is unsupported by the evidence or the record. See Commonwealth v. Miller (Pennsylvania Superior Court, 2014).

    FREE CONSULTATIONS – CALL (215) 564-0644

    Our law firm offers a free consultation for criminal cases including appeals and PCRA petitions. Please call (215) 564-0644 and ask to speak to our criminal appeals lawyers.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.



    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...