Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Pennsylvania PCRA Petitions in Murder Cases – The Importance of Timeliness

    Pennsylvania PCRA Law – Timeliness

    When an individual is considering their criminal appellate rights, especially for a Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition, the first issue that must be considered is timeliness, i.e., is the PCRA petition or appeal beyond the time limits allowed under Pennsylvania criminal law? In fact, the first question most defendants have is whether it is too late to file a PCRA petition in Pennsylvania. The answer depends on the facts and circumstances specific to each case.

    A PCRA petition is required to be filed within the 1 year time limit under 42 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Section 9545 (the Post Conviction Relief Act). Basically, a PCRA petition must be filed within 1 year of the date the underlying judgment becomes final. A judgment is deemed final “at the conclusion of direct review, including discretionary review in the Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, or at the expiration of time for seeking review.” See Section 9545(b)(3).

    There are some limited exceptions, such as governmental interference, newly discovered evidence and a newly recognized constitutional right. However, these exceptions are rather narrow, and rarely do the circumstances of a case meet one of the exceptions. Therefore, in most cases, including murder cases, the strict one year time deadline applies.

    More: PA Criminal Appeals Law – The Basics of Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act Part 2

    Example of the PCRA Timeliness Requirement in a Pennsylvania Murder Case

    A recent Pennsylvania Superior Court reminds all criminal appeals lawyers of the importance of the 1 year time deadline for PCRA petitions. See Commonwealth v. Spann (May 26, 2015). There, the defendant was serving a life sentence for a conviction of 2nd degree murder in 1990. He filed a PCRA petition on October 18, 2012 which was dismissed as untimely by the PCRA court.

    On appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme court refused to reach the underlying merits of the petition, finding that the petition was not timely. Essentially, the court found that the 1 year time limit expired roughly 18 years prior to the filing of the PCRA petition. Because the petition was filed pro se (without counsel), the court analyzed the petitioner’s claims to see if any of the exceptions to the timeliness requirement were met. Ultimately, the court found that none of the exceptions to the 1 year time limit applied and dismissed the appeal.

    Although the Spann case is non-precedential, it serves as a reminder of the importance of the timeliness requirement under Pennsylvania’s PCRA law.

    Philadelphia Criminal Appeals Law Firm – FREE CONSULTATIONS, CALL (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...