Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules in 1st Degree Murder Case PCRA Petition Where Witness Recanted

    Commonwealth v. Small (Pennsylvania Supreme Court, July 18, 2018)

    In murder cases in Pennsylvania, defendants who’re convicted of murder often face enormous difficulties when filing PCRA (Post Conviction Relief Act) petitions. The reality is that the majority of PCRA cases are unsuccessful, especially because the claims are limited by law. One type of PCRA claim – newly discovered evidence – is rarely successful.

    In a July 2018 murder case, Commonwealth v. Small, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered the defendant’s PCRA claim based on newly discovered evidence after the lower appeals court ruled in favor of the prosecution. The PA Supreme Court disagreed with the Superior Court and held that the PCRA court should have indicated whether it considered witness credibility issues. The case was therefore remanded back to the PCRA court.

    This type of outcome is fairly unique in appeals or PCRA cases involving murder or homicide charges like First Degree Murder. Let’s examine the Small case.

    Unwitnessed Shooting – Circumstantial Case

    In the Small case, there was no physical evidence tying the defendant to the shooting. There were no eyewitnesses to the shooting. Instead, the prosecution’s case was entirely circumstantial. It relied heavily on testimony of two jailhouse informants, both of whom shared a jail cell with the defendant. They testified that the defendant admitted shooting the victim. In addition, multiple witnesses testified about the defendant’s behavior prior to and after the shooting. Each witness provided some piece of circumstantial evidence. One witness testified that he saw the defendant walking with the victim moments before he heard a loud sound. The witness testified that he then saw the defendant standing over the victim’s body before he fled.

    Witness for the Prosecution Recants

    In the defendant’s PCRA petition, he argued that another individual, P. Espada, was the shooter. This person was present at the club when the shooting happened and was actually a target in the subsequent police investigation. The PCRA petition presented a sworn statement of one of the key witnesses during the murder trial. The witness recanted and stated that Espada admitted to being the shooter.

    The PCRA court (trial court) considered the witness’ testimony and ordered a new trial. The prosecution appealed to the Superior Court which reversed the PCRA court. The defendant appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

    Interestingly, the issue in the Small case was whether the newly discovered evidence was “merely corroborative or cumulative,” i.e., whether it was redundant. At trial, the defense had presented evidence of two witnesses who testified that Espada had admitted to being the shooter. Therefore, the new evidence presented in the PCRA petition was essentially redundant. The PA Supreme Court’s analysis focused on the issue of credibility, since recantation testimony tends to be viewed as unreliable. Because the PCRA court didn’t indicate what determinations it made on credibility, the Supreme Court remanded for it to do so. Citing another case from 1997, Commonwealth v. Henry, the court in the Small case stressed, “Unless the [PCRA] court is satisfied that the recantation is true, it should deny a new trial.” This basically means that in order to get a new trial, the PCRA court has to believe the witness who recanted. For murder cases, especially appeals or PCRA matters, it’s critical to always be arguing and showing evidence of your client’s innocence where possible.

    For more info, visit the Philadelphia Murder & Homicide Law Library.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    Not guilty on 1st Degree MURDER CHARGE (dec. 2022, Pottsville, Pa)

    Mr. Nenner's client faced first degree murder, third degree murder and various other charges. The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Whitted stabbed and killed a driver after an incident at a red light in West Brunswick Township. Throughout the trial, Mr. Nenner argued...

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.