Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Law in Drug Cases – PA Supreme Court Strikes Drug Sentencing Law (June 2015)

    Last month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court put to rest a major constitutional issue in Philadelphia criminal drug cases—the issue of enhanced sentencing factors, such as the drug-free zone sentencing law and the gun possession sentencing law. See Commonwealth v. Hopkins (June 15, 2015).

    However, this isn’t the first time a court in Pennsylvania has found the drug-free school zone sentencing law unconstitutional. Late last year in Commonwealth v. Bizzel, the PA Superior Court held that application of the drug-free school zone law in that case was unconstitutional. Read more about that case here.

    About PA’s Sentence Enhancing Laws in Drug Cases

    Under these sentence enhancing laws, individuals charged with drug possession/drug dealing crimes face lengthy mandatory minimum prison sentences, if certain triggering facts are proved, i.e., selling drugs within 1,000 feet of a school zone or possessing a firearm during a drug sale.

    Under the current versions of these laws, the sentencing judge must be satisfied that the prosecution has proved these factors, and the standard of proof is quite low. These laws require the prosecution to prove these factors by a preponderance of the evidence, the lowest evidentiary standard under the law.

    This scheme was turned on its head after the United States Supreme Court held that sentence enhancing facts must be submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the same standard applied to the elements of the crime (Alleyne v. U.S., 2013).

    After the Alleyne case was handed down, prosecutors throughout PA tried to apply the sentence enhancing laws by simply adding the fact to jury verdict slips. Some judges allowed this practice which is now unconstitutional under the recent Hopkins case. The Hopkins court held that special verdict slips do not cure the constitutional defects of the sentence enhancing laws. In addition, the court held that the law could not be saved by applying the principle of severability. Under this principle, unconstitutional sections of laws can be severed from the constitutional ones, thus saving the law. Despite strong dissents arguing otherwise, the court struck the law down. Now, the Pennsylvania legislature must cure the defect by rewriting the laws.

    More: Arrested for Drugs in Pennsylvania? Read About PA’s Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    Philadelphia Drug Charge Lawyer – FREE CONSULTATIONS

    Get a free consultation for your drug charge case in Philadelphia. Our criminal lawyers have decades of experience defending residents of Philadelphia in criminal cases. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.


    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...