FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Auto Stop Yielding Large Amounts of Cocaine, Suppression Granted by Philadelphia Trial Judge

    *For immediate release, November 1, 2014

    Philadelphia

    Just last month in October, partner David Nenner succeeded in getting a judge to suppress large amounts of drugs (cocaine) found in his client’s car during an auto stop in Philadelphia.

    Mr. Nenner successfully argued that the Philadelphia police failed to obtain a warrant and therefore had no right to search his client’s car. The trial judge agreed and ordered the large amount of cocaine (150 grams) suppressed, effectively ending the case.

    However, the trial court’s ruling is being appealed to the Pennsylvania Superior Court. How this appellate court ultimately rules will have serious implications for Philadelphia criminal cases involving drugs, guns and other contraband seized from auto searches.

    Background & History of PA Auto Search Law in Criminal Drug-Gun Cases

    Earlier this year in April, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court made major changes to state constitutional law which applies in criminal auto stop cases. In Commonwealth v. Gary, the court held that police officers may stop and search a car without a warrant so long as there is probable cause (i.e., reasonable basis to form a belief that a crime has been committed or is being committed). Prior to the Gary decision, police officers in Pennsylvania had to get a warrant to search a car unless there was both probable cause and an exigent circumstance. An exigent circumstance is basically an emergency condition or factor, like imminent danger to the general public.

    Discussion of Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer David Nenner’s Recent Drug Case

    In Mr. Nenner’s case, his client was a Hispanic man who was driving from New York to Philadelphia. His car was stopped in Philadelphia, and without a warrant, police officers seized over 100 grams of cocaine. He was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (PWID), and under state sentencing guidelines, faced a prison sentence of at least 4 years for a 1st time offense or 7 years for a second time offense (See 18 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Section 7508).

    Prior to the auto stop, local police in Philadelphia had been investigating an alleged large scale drug operation involving multiple individuals in the New York and Philadelphia area. Mr. Nenner’s client was arrested along with several alleged co-conspirators.

    Related: Philadelphia Criminal Drug Law, Suppression of Drugs & Guns Found in a Car (Part 2)

    Mr. Nenner filed a Motion to Suppress all the evidence seized from the car his client was driving. At the hearing, he argued that the officers had ample time to obtain a warrant prior to stopping his client and searching the car. Because the officers had ample time to get a search warrant, but failed to, they violated his client’s constitutional rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the federal and Pennsylvania state constitutions.

    The Philadelphia trial judge agreed and suppressed the drugs found in the car. The Philadelphia District Attorney’s office has appealed the case.

    One issue that came up during the hearing was whether the Gary decision applied. Despite the clear mandate of the Gary case – which is that officers can search a car without a warrant so long as there is probable cause – there has been some confusion about when it applies. The decision was handed down in April 2014. Therefore, there are questions about whether it apples to drug investigations that had already occurred (i.e., does the case apply to drug cases/investigations which had occurred before the case was decided)? For now, no appellate court has found that the Gary decision is retroactive.

    Therefore, many criminal trial lawyers in Philadelphia will be paying attention to this case on appeal. How the Pennsylvania Superior Court rules may affect many drug cases that are currently pending.

    Philadelphia Criminal Lawyers Specializing in Drug Cases

    Our criminal lawyers have handled 100s of drug possession and distribution cases. Please call for a free consultation. 215.564.0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...