FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – PWID

    The two most common drug charges or offenses in Philadelphia criminal cases are: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver.

    Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) – The Law & Elements of the Crime

    In order to be found guilty of a crime in Pennsylvania, the District Attorney’s (DA) office must prove each and every element of the crime, beyond a reasonable doubt. If the DA’s office fails to prove even one of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant will be found not guilty by the court or by a jury.

    In a Philadelphia state court drug case for Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID), the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:

    • the item is a controlled substance (i.e., marijuana, crack, cocaine, heroin, prescription drug without an authorized prescription, etc.),
    • the defendant actually possessed the item,
    • the defendant knew or was aware of the item and knew that it was a controlled substance, and
    • the defendant possessed the item with the specific intent to deliver the item to another person or use the item to manufacture a controlled substance.

    The first three elements the DA’s office must prove in a PWID drug case are the same as a drug case for Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS). Click here to learn what the DA has to prove in a PCS drug case in PA. However, in PWID cases, the DA’s office must prove an additional element, the intent or goal of delivering the drugs.

    Proving Intent to Deliver in a PWID Drug Case in Pennsylvania

    This additional element is where many PWID cases are fought and won by defendants. Proving the specific intent to deliver (selling or otherwise transferring the item) is usually based on circumstantial evidence, i.e., the facts and circumstances surrounding the investigation and arrest. For instance, in clear cut cases, a large quantity of drugs such as cocaine found with 100 small baggies would demonstrate an intent to sell. However, without such evidence, proving intent to deliver can be tricky for the DA’s office.

    To illustrate: In Philadelphia, it is common for a drug investigation/arrest to occur at a residence, for example in North or West Philadelphia. There may be multiple people present at the time of the arrest. Depending on the quantity of the drugs present and the investigation, more than one individual may be arrested and charged with drug related offenses, such as PCS with Intent to Deliver. In this kind of situation, one of the individuals arrested may be able to attack the DA’s case, by arguing that they did not intend to actually deliver the drugs. This essentially casts doubt on the intent to deliver element.

    In some drug cases, an improper lab test or issue with evidence can result in dismissal of the charges. In addition, it is important to note that some first time offenders who are charged with PWID may be able to enter a special drug treatment program instead of having the case processed through the normal court system. Entry into drug treatment programs is up to the local District Attorney’s office.

    Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer Handling Drug Charges FREE CONSULTATIONS

    If you or a loved one was arrested for a drug related charge in the Philadelphia area, including Montgomery, Delaware and Bucks County or in federal court, please call our criminal lawyers for a free consultation. (215) 564-0644

    David Nenner is an experienced criminal lawyer who has handled many drug cases in both Pennsylvania state and federal court. He offers a free phone consultation for all drug and gun cases.

    DISCLAIMER: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Since each case is unique, discussion of prior outcomes and settlements in past cases is no guarantee of a similar outcome in current or future cases. Contacting our lawyers via the email contact form on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through the contact form.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...