FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer Discusses Why Defendants May Not Want to Testify at Trial

    Criminal shows on television, such as Law and Order, often show defendants testifying at trial to show their innocence.  However, in real world criminal trials, defendants generally do not take the stand if they don’t have to.  Some of my clients may want to testify at trial; however, in most instances if they do not need to testify, I advise against it.  The jury is instructed that if a defendant does not testify at trial, it cannot be used against them.  In other words, it is not evidence of guilt.  The jury cannot use the fact that the defendant didn’t testify to determine guilt.

    In this article we discuss why defendants may not want to testify at Philadelphia criminal trials

    The Burden of Proof Rests with the Prosecution

    In Philadelphia criminal cases, the burden of proof rests with the prosecution.  In other words, the prosecution has to prove that the defendant committed the alleged crime(s).  The defendant does not have to prove anything, i.e., their innocence.  In addition, the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the alleged crime(s). There cannot be a shred of reasonable doubt, which is a high burden to bear.

    Criminal defense lawyers present defenses that poke holes in the prosecution’s theory.  We do not need the defendant to take the stand.  For instance, in a murder trial, the prosecution presents their star witness who testifies that she saw the defendant shoot the victim.

    As it turns out, the eye witness is unreliable.  She is the defendant’s ex-girlfriend and is known for trying to get back at the defendant.  Therefore, the bias of the witness can be questioned.  There are several other witnesses who testify that the ex-girlfriend was nowhere near the crime scene; therefore, she could not have witnessed the crime.

    If the witness was the only evidence that tied the defendant to the crime, then the prosecution did not meet its burden to prove that the defendant committed the murder.

    Related: Silence is Golden

    Defendant’s Fifth Amendment Right to Self-Incrimination

    The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution states that defendants have the right to protect themselves from being compelled to be a witness against themselves in criminal cases.  They do not have to testify and they cannot be compelled by the prosecution to testify.  However, if defendants decide to testify, they cannot plead the fifth during cross-examination.  Once defendants take the stand, they will be cross-examined by the prosecution.

    During cross- examination, the prosecution can attack the defendant’s credibility and can bring in evidence of crimes of dishonesty committed by the defendant.  If the defendant is innocent but was convicted of prior dishonesty crimes, the jury may not believe his testimony.  Therefore, there is a risk associated with the defendant testifying at their own trial.

    The Defendant Would Not Be a Good Witness

    Sometimes, we advise defendants not to take the stand and the reason has nothing to do with legal theory or evidence.  The defendant may not be a good witness.  They may be overly emotional, nervous and/or anxious, which may come across to the jury that the defendant is being evasive during cross-examination.  Thus, not appearing genuine or credible on the stand.  If so, the jury is more likely not to believe the defendant’s testimony.

    Final Thoughts

    In most Philadelphia criminal cases, defendants don’t take the stand at trial.  However, this does not mean if the defendant takes the stand, they will lose the criminal trial.  Some cases require the defendant to take the stand.  Each case is different and an experienced Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer would come up with the best defense and strategy for your case.

    FREE Consultations from a Top Rated Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

    If you are charged with a crime in Philadelphia and would like to discuss your case with a lawyer, contact David Nenner, who has been a Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer for over 30 years. 215.564.0644

    Mr. Nenner Gets High Praise From Clients

    Mr. Nenner, I had the best time yesterday speaking with you and Beth, I know in my heart my brothers case was destined to be within your office. I am so blessed and so grateful to have sent by God such a great team…no matter which way the ball falls I no that this office has exceeded it’s best and through it all I have met some outstanding and trustworthy individuals…my gratitude… to each and everyone of you and if I can assist in any endeavor you have I am a phone call away, this office will always have my trust, loyalty, commitment and support. – S.R. (Appeal of defendant’s conviction of murder in West Philadelphia)

    “We would like to extend our gratitude and appreciation for all you have done for us. It is obvious you two have been working diligently on this case and it feels great to finally have someone to really fight for us and keep us actively involved! Dave, your argument was FABULOUS  and beyond words. We just regret that we didn’t find you guys 5 years ago. I pray in the end your hard work pays off!!” – Wendy and Mike Degilio

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.