Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer Discusses Conspiracy Crimes – Elements of the Crime

    Top Rated Philadelphia PA criminal defense lawyerCriminal conspiracy is one of the common charges we see in many Philadelphia criminal defense cases.  Most do not understand how individuals are convicted of criminal conspiracy.  Due to many television shows and movies, people often think when defendants conspire to commit a crime, they are sitting in a dark room planning and scheming on how to commit crimes such as robbery and murder.  In real life, that is often not the case.  Conspirators do not have to explicitly say they are going to commit a crime in order to be charged.

    We will discuss examples of this in a later blog.

    Pennsylvania Statutes Title 18 Section 903(a) defines criminal conspiracy as the following:

     A person is guilty of conspiracy with another person or persons to commit a crime if with the intent of promoting or facilitating its commission he:

    (1)  agrees with such other person or persons that they or one or more of them will engage in conduct which constitutes such crime or an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime; or
    (2)  agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime.

    Therefore, under PA criminal laws, in order to be charged with conspiracy, a person has to agree with one or more persons that one or more of them will commit a crime, or the person agrees to help or aid one or more persons in planning or committing a crime.

    In addition, Title 18 Section 903(e) provides,

    Overt act.–No person may be convicted of conspiracy to commit a crime unless an overt act in pursuance of such conspiracy is alleged and proved to have been done by him or by a person with whom he conspired.

    This means that in order for individuals to be committed of a conspiracy crime, there also must be an overt act in furtherance of the crime, such as buying a gun that will be used in a robbery.

    What people may not understand is that if the underlying crime was only committed by one person, all other conspirators face the same penalties of the crime even though they did not commit the crime themselves.  Just because the person did not commit the actual crime does not mean that person will face a lessor penalty than the person that committed the crime.

    Below are three examples of how this works.

    Conspiracy to Commit a Robbery

    Four individuals (A, B, C & D) decide to rob a bank.  The plan was for A and B to go inside the bank and get the money from the tellers. C was to stand outside the bank as a lookout.  Finally, D was to stay in a car and be ready to get A, B and C after the robbery.

    The robbery was successful, but the individuals were later arrested.  All of them are charged with conspiracy to commit a robbery even though C and D were not physically inside the bank.  They will all face the same penalty.

    Conspiracy to Commit a Robbery and Aggravated Assault

    Using the same above hypothetical, and let’s add the following: A and B pull their guns on different tellers demanding them to put money in the bag.  Unbeknownst to A and B, there is an off-duty police officer inside the bank during the robbery.  The police officer tries to knock A down which results in a struggle between them.  During the struggle, A’s gun accidentally fires, and the police officer is shot in the stomach.

    The police arrive on the scene before A, B, C and D can get away.  All are arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit a robbery and aggravated assault.  Even though B, C and D did not shoot the security guard, if A is convicted of aggravated assault, B, C, and D will also be convicted of the same crime, as well as conspiracy.

    Conspiracy to Commit a Robbery and Murder

    Let’s add another assumption to the above example.  If the police officer later dies as a result of the gun-shot wound, then A will now face a felony murder charge.  Again, if A is convicted, B, C and D may also be convicted even though B, C and D did not have any intention of hurting anyone during the robbery.

    Stay tuned for part 2 of this article, in which we will discuss defenses to conspiracy charges.

    FREE Consultations from a Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

    David Nenner, Esq. is an experienced Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer who has handled countless criminal cases.  Unlike many Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers, Mr. Nenner offers FREE consultations.  215.564.0644

    Mr. Nenner has been selected as one of the “Top Rated Criminal Defense Attorney in Philadelphia, PA.”

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    Not guilty on 1st Degree MURDER CHARGE (dec. 2022, Pottsville, Pa)

    Mr. Nenner's client faced first degree murder, third degree murder and various other charges. The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Whitted stabbed and killed a driver after an incident at a red light in West Brunswick Township. Throughout the trial, Mr. Nenner argued...

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.