Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer Discusses Murder and Homicide Defenses (Part 2)

In part 1 of this article, we discussed the alibi defense in Philadelphia murder and homicide cases. Notice must be given to the prosecution if an alibi defense is going to be presented at trial. In addition, specific details such as the location of the defendant on the night of the incident and names of witnesses with the defendant must also be provided.

At trial, witnesses testifying for the defendant will be cross examined by the prosecution. The prosecution may attack the credibility of a witness. For instance, a defendant is on trial for shooting a victim at a party. The defendant pleads not guilty and maintains that he was with his girlfriend on the night of the shooting at her home hanging out. At trial, the prosecution cross examines the girlfriend and establishes that she is the defendant’s girlfriend. The witness also testifies that she would do anything for her boyfriend, including lying for her boyfriend. Based on this, the prosecution argues that the girlfriend is not a reliable witness because she would lie for her boyfriend and she may not even have been with the defendant on the night of the shooting.

Video Evidence

Presenting an alibi witness is not the only way to prove that a defendant was not at the scene of the murder. A video is another way to prove that a defendant was not at the crime scene, and therefore, could not have committed the murder. Using the above example, even though the girlfriend’s credibility is attacked, the defense lawyer can present video evidence to help establish alibi. The girlfriend’s home has an outdoor camera, and the defense lawyer presents a video showing the defendant going to his girlfriend’s home on the night of the shooting. The video is time stamped and shows the defendant ringing the doorbell and entering the home about a couple of hours before the shooting. The video also shows the defendant leaving the house about the same time of the shooting. Even though the girlfriend’s credibility may be questioned, the video shows that the defendant was not at the shooting because he was leaving his girlfriend’s house at the time.

About David S. Nenner, a Top Rated Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

David Nenner has been a criminal lawyer for over 30 years. He has tried countless murder and homicide cases in Philadelphia. He has been featured in the local media multiple times defending individuals in high profile criminal homicide cases. Mr. Nenner offers FREE initial consultations. 215.564.0644

David S. Nenner

"Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
(2015-2022)

MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...