Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    How Miranda Warnings Impact PA Drug Cases – By a Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

    If you have watched any criminal based shows on television, you most likely know what Miranda warnings are.  When arresting an individual, the police officer on the television show would say, “You have the right to remain silent.  Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.”

    Your Miranda rights protect you from self-incrimination pursuant to the 5th Amendment.  If you are arrested and Miranda rights are not read to you, there is a chance that the criminal case will be affected, i.e., dismissed.

    The Miranda warnings must be provided by the police before they can question individuals who are arrested for crimes, such as drug related crimes.  If the police question the individuals without providing the warnings and the arrested individuals answer, their statements may not be used in a court of law.

    Consider the following example. An individual is arrested in West Philadelphia and charged with Possession with the Intent to Deliver (PWID) drugs.  The arresting officer does not read the individual his Miranda rights.  At the station, another police officer questions the individual about his involvement in a drug ring.  During the interrogation, the individual provides the name of his employer, i.e., the person providing the drugs, and admits that he has been selling them to high school kids on a daily basis.

    Drug Case Dismissed – No Miranda Warnings

    Even though the arrested individual admits that he was selling drugs to kids and the case should be an open and shut case, his statements given during the interrogation cannot be used against him.  The reason? You guessed it, because his Miranda rights were not read to him.

    In such a case, an experienced Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer would file a Motion to Suppress the individual’s statements.  The judge would most likely grant the motion and not allow the statements to be used at trial, if there is one.

    The fact that the individual’s statements cannot be used does not necessarily mean that the case would be dismissed.  If the prosecution does not have any other evidence against the individual for the crime, i.e., PWID, then the case would be dismissed.

    Drug Case NOT Dismissed – No Miranda Warnings

    However, if the prosecution has other evidence against the individual, the case can still proceed.  For instance, let’s says that prior to the arrest, undercover police officers set up a sting to buy drugs from the individual.  The day prior to the arrest, an undercover police officer contacts the individual and a meeting is arranged. They meet at a corner in a neighborhood in West Philadelphia.  The police officer buys 5 bags of meth from the individual.  The police officer then tells the individual that he has friends that want to buy as well.  The individual tells the officer to have his friends call him and that he’s got plenty to go around.  The police officer completes the sale and leaves with 5 bags of meth.

    In this case, even though the individual’s statements are suppressed because he was not read his Miranda warnings, there is other evidence against him.  The police officer would be a witness for the prosecution and testify about the drug transaction.  In addition, if drugs and money were found in the arrested individual’s home after executing a proper search warrant, the drugs and money would also be used as evidence against the defendant.  The case would proceed without the individual’s statements.

    Help from a Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer After an Arrest

    If you or a loved one was arrested for a crime in Philadelphia, seek help from top rated Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer, David Nenner.  Mr. Nenner has helped countless individuals and aggressively fights for his clients.  Unlike many criminal defense lawyers, Mr. Nenner always offers a FREE initial consultation.  Call 215.564.0644 to schedule a free consult.

    Recent News Coverage – Mr. Nenner Gets Wrongly Accused Client Released from Jail

    Mr. Nenner was recently interviewed by the Philadelphia Daily News about his client who was wrongly accused of murder and spent the last 17 months in jail.  A murder trial was scheduled.  However, due to Mr. Nenner’s investigation and research, he uncovered evidence which challenged the DA’s theory that his client was the shooter.  As a result, Mr. Nenner was able to get his client released from jail.  Click here to read more about the case.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...