Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Drug Cases & Civil Forfeitures – Losing the Home, The Innocent Owner Defense

    Civil forfeiture of homes in Philadelphia is big business. Each year, the Philadelphia prosecutor’s office and police department split roughly $6 million dollars, money received from selling forfeited property, i.e., cars, homes, etc. Much of those funds pay salaries and drug investigations.

    Home owners risk losing their homes because a relative dealt drugs out of the home. For example, a parent may lose their home because a son or daughter sold drugs out of the home. In a civil forfeiture hearing involving a home, the DA simply has to prove a connection between the home and the criminal activity, i.e., drug dealing. Read more about civil forfeitures in drug dealing cases in Philadelphia.

    The burden of proof in these civil forfeiture actions is quite low and is the lowest legal burden under the law, the preponderance of the evidence standard. Under this standard, the DA only has to present enough evidence showing that it is more likely than not that drugs were stored or sold out of the home. Compared to the beyond a reasonable doubt standard, the preponderance of the evidence standard is like a cakewalk.

    Related: Philadelphia Criminal Drug Arrest News (April 2014)

    The Innocent Owner Defense in Forfeiture Actions Involving Alleged Drug Homes

    Once the DA proves the initial connection or nexus, the home owner can rebut by arguing they were innocent. This is the innocent owner defense which requires proving the following (as laid out in 42 Pa. C.S. Section 6802(j)):

    (1) The claimant is the owner of the home.

    (2) The claimant legally obtained the home.

    (3) The home was not illegally used or illegally possessed by the claimant.

    In addition, the law also indicates that in cases where another person conducted the illegal activity (drug dealing), the claimant must show that they had no knowledge of the activity and did not consent to it, as supported by the circumstances. This basically means that in a case where a relative sold drugs out of the home, the owner must not have known about it, and the circumstances must support that lack of knowledge.

    For example, a parent will have a hard time arguing lack of knowledge of the drug dealing if the drug dealing continued for years and in plain view, i.e., the relative conducted transactions in front of others in the house.

    The key is having sufficient, reasonable evidence to support lack of knowledge. For example, a parent will have a better chance of arguing the innocent owner defense in a case where a college student comes home for the summer and deals drugs out of the home. It will be crucial to call credible witnesses and present other types of evidence, such as pictures of the home at various periods showing the lack of drug paraphernalia around the house.

    Criminal Drug Charge Lawyer in Philadelphia

    If you or a loved one is facing drug charges in Philadelphia, please call our office for a free case review. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...