FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Appeals – What Is the Difference Between Direct Appeals and PCRA Petitions in Pennsylvania? (Part II)

     David Nenner, Philadelphia, PA Criminal Defense Lawyer – Drug and Murder Charges David Nenner, a Philadelphia, PA Criminal Defense Lawyer
    Review: “May God continue to bless you and your firm and families. I cannot thank you enough!” (A high profile Philadelphia murder case which resulted in an acquittal.) Read more reviews here.
    FREE Consultations: 215.564.0644


    In part I of this article, we discussed the difference between direct appeals and PCRA petitions in PA criminal cases and the grounds of appeal for direct appeals.  Part II of this article will discuss the different grounds of appeal for PCRA petitions.

    Pursuant to 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9543(a)(2), the following are the grounds of appeal for PCRA petitions:

    (i)  A violation of the Constitution of this Commonwealth or the Constitution or laws of the United States which, in the circumstances of the particular case, so undermined the truth-determining process that no reliable adjudication of guilt or innocence could have taken place.

    (ii)  Ineffective assistance of counsel which, in the circumstances of the particular case, so undermined the truth-determining process that no reliable adjudication of guilt or innocence could have taken place.

    (iii)  A plea of guilty unlawfully induced where the circumstances make it likely that the inducement caused the petitioner to plead guilty and the petitioner is innocent.

    (iv) The improper obstruction by government officials of the petitioner’s right of appeal where a meritorious appealable issue existed and was properly preserved in the trial court.

    (v)  (Deleted by amendment).

    (vi) The unavailability at the time of trial of exculpatory evidence that has subsequently become available and would have changed the outcome of the trial if it had been introduced.

    (vii)  The imposition of a sentence greater than the lawful maximum.

    (viii)  A proceeding in a tribunal without jurisdiction.

    PCRA Petitions – Common Grounds of Appeal

    Common grounds of appeal for PCRA petitions are ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence.

    Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9543(a)(2)(ii))

    In a nutshell, ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) occurs when criminal trial lawyers were incompetent in their representation of their clients and because of their actions, “no reliable adjudication of guilt or innocence could have taken place.”

    Examples of how criminal defense lawyers providing ineffective assistance of counsel are failing to call an alibi witness at trial and failing to explain the plea bargaining deal to the defendant.  However, defendants must meet a three-prong test to prove that their lawyers were ineffective:

    • there is arguable merit,
    • counsel’s act or omission was unreasonable,
    • the defendant was prejudiced.

    See a discussion of the three-prong related to proving ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC).

    Newly Discovered Evidence (42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9543(a)(2)(vi))

    Newly discovered evidence is another common ground of appeal.  Essentially, defendants are arguing that evidence not available during trial has become available.  In addition, if the evidence was presented at trial, defendants would not have been convicted.

    Like IAC, there are requirements defendants must establish in order for new evidence to be considered newly discovered evidence pursuant to the law.

    Defendants must establish 3 things:

    1. the unavailability of the evidence at the time of trial,
    2. the evidence is exculpatory in nature, and
    3. the outcome of the trial would have been different, i.e., the defendant would not have been convicted.

    Stay tuned for a discussion of other grounds of appeal for PCRA petitions.

    Help Filing a PCRA Petition or Criminal Appeal in Philadelphia, PA

    If you have questions about filing a criminal appeal or a PCRA petition for a loved one after trial, David S. Nenner, a top rated criminal defense lawyer in Philadelphia, can help. Call (215) 564-0644 for a free consultation.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...