Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019

    ArrestOne of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often involve narcotics, heroin, cocaine, meth, etc. To be found guilty of these offenses, the Commonwealth (DA) must prove that the arrested individual actually possessed the drugs. For the crime of PWID, the Commonwealth (DA) must prove an additional element – intent to deliver.

    Cases accepted in Philadelphia, Delaware, Chester, Lackawanna & Montgomery Counties. FREE CONSULTATIONS (215) 564-0644

    Proving Possession with a Defendant’s Statement

    Proving possession is often accomplished with the defendant’s pre and post-arrest statements. For instance, after arrest, a defendant may admit to owning the drugs by blurting out before being arrested, “Those drugs are mine.” Pre-arrest statements are often difficult to suppress, as are statements made after arrest and Miranda rights have been read. Therefore after arrest, it is important to exercise the constitutional right to remain silent. Click here to read about the right to remain silent and the importance of exercising that right.

    What is Possession in a Philadelphia Criminal Drug Case

    Possession in a Philadelphia drug case basically means that someone knowingly holds, carries, or otherwise directly controls the drugs. Mere knowledge of the presence and nature of the drugs (i.e., that drugs are present and that they are in fact, drugs) is not enough to prove the element of possession. Possession requires something more than simple knowledge, such as holding, touching, carrying, transporting, etc.

    Related: Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    However, it is important to note that an individual can be found guilty of possession even though they were not holding, touching or carrying the drugs. This is constructive possession. Someone can still control drugs even though they did not actually hold/touch/carry the drugs.

    Attacking the Commonwealth’s case in a drug case in Philadelphia often requires thorough investigation of the facts and circumstances of the case. Succeeding in a drug case by attacking the government’s argument regarding possession means making the following types of arguments:

    • another person possessed the drugs,
    • lack of knowledge of the presence of the drugs, and
    • lack of knowledge of the nature of the drugs.

    Joint Possession – More Than One Person Can Possess Drugs

    In some cases, the Commonwealth may be able to prove that more than one person possessed the drugs. Under Pennsylvania criminal law, more than one person can in fact, possess drugs. However, each individual must have the intent to exercise joint control over the drugs, and each must have the power to control the drugs.

    Conspiracy & Drug Charges

    In some cases, even if an individual clearly did not possess drugs, they may be found guilty of the crime of Possession of a Controlled Substance, if it is proved that they were part of a conspiracy. In other words, the Commonwealth would be required to show that the defendant was part of a conspiracy, another co-conspirator possessed the drugs, and that possession occurred during the course of the conspiracy and furthered the goals of the conspiracy.

    Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer Handling Drug Charges FREE CONSULTATIONS

    If you or a loved one was arrested for a drug related charge in the Philadelphia area, including Montgomery, Delaware and Bucks County or in federal court, please call our criminal lawyers for a free consultation. (215) 564-0644

    David Nenner is an experienced criminal defense lawyer who has handled many drug cases in both Pennsylvania state and federal court. He offers a free phone consultation for all drug and gun cases.

    DISCLAIMER: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Since each case is unique, discussion of prior outcomes and settlements in past cases is no guarantee of a similar outcome in current or future cases. Contacting our lawyers via the email contact form on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through the contact form.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...