FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Cases – The Importance of Objections During a Philadelphia Murder Trial (Part 2)

    In a recent Philadelphia murder trial, firm partner and top rated Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer, David Nenner, Esq., made objections and legal arguments that allowed his client to later successfully appeal his conviction.  The appellate court awarded the defendant a new trial due to the errors made by the trial court.  Below is a discussion of the trial court’s errors and objections raised during trial.

    To learn more about the facts of the case, click here.

    Inadmissible Hearsay

    One of the witnesses called by the prosecution was the victim’s brother.  During trial, he testified that his brother (victim) told him that he stole cocaine from the defendant and showed him the cocaine.  In addition, the victim’s brother testified that the lyrics of the defendant’s song “Take It How You Wanna” were about his brother stealing defendant’s cocaine.  The lyrics also included a threat to kill the person responsible.

    During trial, Mr. Nenner objected to the witness’s testimony with respect to the victim’s statements and defendant’s song lyrics.  The victim’s statements were hearsay and irrelevant, which are inadmissible per PA rules of evidence.

    Hearsay is an out of court statement made for the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Because the person who made the statements is not in court, the opposing side cannot cross-examine him or her.

    There are exceptions to the hearsay rule, and one of them is the state of mind exception.  A hearsay statement may be admitted into evidence if it is to establish the declarant’s state of mind and not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

    At trial, the prosecution argued that the victim’s hearsay statement was admissible because it established his state of mind, i.e., the victim feared the defendant, and established a motive for the victim’s murder.

    The trial court held that the victim’s statement was allowed because it is circumstantial evidence of the victim’s fear of the defendant, which established his state of mind, but the statement could not be admitted as substantive evidence of the theft of the cocaine.

    Mr. Nenner’s objected to the victim’s statement because the statement was being offered for its truth, i.e., the defendant had motive to kill the victim.  Even if the statement was being offered to show the victim’s state of mind, it was irrelevant to the issue of the case.

    The appellate court found that the trial court made an error by allowing the victim’s hearsay statement and agreed that the statement was being offered for the truth and that the victim’s statement of mind was irrelevant.

    Stay tuned for part 3 of this article which discusses Mr. Nenner’s objections over the admissibility of the defendant’s song lyrics which helped the defendant win his appeal.

    Related:  PA Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) Petitions

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer

    David Nenner is a Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer who handles cases such as homicide, gun possession and drug charges in Philadelphia. If you have a question about your case, schedule a FREE consultation with Mr. Nenner.  215.564.0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – Possession of a Controlled Substance

    In most criminal drug cases in Philadelphia, there are two common charges or offenses: Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver. In addition to these drug charges, there are other drug related charges, such...

    Drug Charges in Philadelphia PA State Court – What is “Possession”

    Page last reviewed and updated: October 20, 2019 One of the most common types of criminal state (PA) cases in Philadelphia is possession of drugs. Possession of a Controlled Substance (PCS) and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PWID) often...

    Pennsylvania Second Degree Murder (AKA: Felony Murder) Law

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David S. Nenner discusses the current status of second degree murder law in Pennsylvania. This is also known as the felony murder rule. Get info about PA court decisions and the agency theory. Not every case of death during the commission of a felony will result in a second degree murder conviction in PA.

    Philadelphia Murder Cases – Police Investigation Tactics

    Questioning Police Officer Tactics in Philadelphia Murder Cases Within the last 10 years, there have been several murder Philadelphia criminal cases in which the accused individuals were acquitted of the crimes. In these cases, the individuals spent months, if not...

    Murder Charges in Pennsylvania – Murder Law in Pennsylvania

    An explanation of Pennsylvania murder laws including Section 2502. What is murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and murder in the third degree. Get a summary of the definitions under Pennsylvania criminal law.