Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Murder Cases – The Alibi Defense

    One of the most common defenses raised in a Philadelphia criminal case is the alibi defense. It is often raised in murder, attempted murder, robbery, and assault cases. Criminal trial lawyers who handle murder cases often raise the alibi defense at trial.

    What is the Alibi Defense?

    An alibi defense shows that the defendant was physically not present at the specific location where the charged offense(s) occurred. The evidence must show that it was physically impossible for the defendant to have committed the crime because the defendant was somewhere else at the time of the crime. See generally, Commonwealth v. Mikell, (Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1999).

    When Can the Alibi Defense Be Raised?

    The alibi defense can be raised upon motion or notice. Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure require a criminal defendant to provide sufficient notion of the intention to present the alibi defense. See PA Rule of Criminal Procedure 567, which lays out the requirements.

    The notice must identify the location/place where the defendant was at the time the offense is alleged to have occurred. The notice must also list the names/addresses of any witnesses who will testify in support of the alibi defense.

    Related: Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act Petitions – Raising the Alibi Defense at Trial

    How Do You Prove an Alibi?

    Proving an alibi requires evidence such as video footage, pictures or witness testimony, including the defendant’s testimony if he/she takes the witnesses stand. However, there is no requirement for the defendant to present corroborating evidence. In some cases, the defendant’s testimony, alone, may be sufficient to prove an alibi defense.

    Alibi Raised in a Philadelphia Murder Case – A Look at a Recent case

    From a trial strategy standpoint, presenting testimony from credible witnesses, or better yet, video footage showing that the defendant was present elsewhere at the time of the crime, increases the chances of an acquittal. In one Philadelphia murder case, criminal lawyer David Nenner presented video surveillance showing that the client was physically in another part of the city when the alleged murder occurred. The jury found the client not guilty. The case was featured in multiple news articles. See How videos convinced a jury that Amin Speakes, after 2 years behind bars, was not guilty of murder, February 8, 2012.

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Law Firm – Murder Charges

    Our criminal lawyers handle murder cases in Pennsylvania, primarily in the southeastern area of PA including Philadelphia County, Montgomery County, Delaware County, Chester County, and parts of the Lehigh Valley area (Scranton, Lackawanna County). For a free consultation, please call our offices at (215) 564-0644.

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...