FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Post-Trial & Appellate Procedures – What to Know if You Lost at Trial (Part 1)

    Criminal Trials in Philadelphia

    Many Philadelphia residents who are facing criminal charges such as murder, attempted murder or serious drug distribution charges will roll the dice and take their cases to trial. This is fairly common because Philadelphia has a relatively low conviction rate, which is probably attributable to a varied jury pool and the sheer number of criminal cases.

    While the odds are generally good for someone facing criminal charges in Philadelphia, the reality is that winning a Philadelphia criminal trial depends on a lot of different factors. There is no winning formula. Who the trial judge is and how the jury is selected are two key factors. For instance, how a trial judge rules on a piece of evidence can literally make or break a case. A jury stacked with sympathetic women in a rape case can also make or break a case.

    Someone who has lost a criminal trial has a few options, but not a lot of time to decide what to do. This article will discuss the three options available to a Philadelphia resident who has just lost a criminal trial and been sentenced. Part 1 of this article will discuss post-sentence motions, and part 2 will discuss direct appeals and PCRA (Post-Conviction Relief Act) petitions.

    Post-Sentence Motions

    Under Pennsylvania criminal rules of procedure, a criminal defendant can file certain post-sentence motions. These motions are filed with the trial judge, basically asking for reconsideration.

    Rule 720 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure lays out post-sentence motions (how they are filed, grounds for these motions, timelines, etc.). Per Rule 720, a criminal defendant can raise pretty much any issue relevant to the case. However, this does not mean that post-sentence motions should be filed for any and all reasons. Instead, post-sentence motions should only be filed when there is a reasonable basis to do so, which will depend on the facts of the case.

    Generally, grounds for successful post-sentence motions include:

    • new evidence,
    • a legal issue like a recent PA Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court case, or
    • sentencing issues based on legal errors.

    It is important to note that Rule 720 post-sentence motions must be filed within strict timelines, which vary depending on the issue raised. Motions for new trials based on newly discovered evidence can be raised after discovery. Generally, most other motions must be filed within 10 days of the date of the sentencing order.

    More: Criminal Appeals in Pennsylvania & Proper Investigation

    Example 1 – Newly Discovered Evidence

    After an attempted murder trial in Philadelphia, the defendant is found guilty. A few days after the trial, an unknown individual contacts the defendant’s family and says that they witnessed the shooting, but failed to come forward out of fear. This witness states that the defendant did not commit the shooting and wasn’t even at the scene of the crime.

    Here, the defendant’s best course of action is to file a post-sentence motion for a new trial based on the new eyewitness. So long as it’s clear that the defense attorney could not have reasonably found the witness before trial, the trial judge would likely grant a new trial.

    Example 2 – New PA Supreme Court Case

    The day after a defendant is sentenced in a criminal case in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issues a game-changing opinion that applies retroactively (i.e., applies to cases that have already occurred). The best course of action would be to file a post-sentence motion, and the trial court would likely be forced to apply the new case.

    While this scenario might seem far-fetched, it can and does happen. Criminal law is always changing. In fact, over the last year, Pennsylvania drug cases have been turned upside down due to recent changes to constitutional law by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Click here for part 2 of this article which discusses direct appeals and PCRA petitions.

    FREE CONSULTATIONS with our Criminal Appellate Lawyers: (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...