Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Drug Cases – Can You Be Charged with Possession of Drugs When the Drugs WereNot Found on You?

    In Philadelphia drug cases, individuals do not actually have to have possession of drugs on their persons to be charged with possession.  They may be charged with drug possession if there is constructive possession.

    What is Constructive Possession of Drugs in Philadelphia?

    In order to prove that defendants had constructive possession under Pennsylvania drug law, the prosecution must prove the following:

    • The individual knew that the drugs were located at, in or around the place where they were discovered.
    • The individual knew or should have known that the drugs are illegal.
    • The individual had control of the drugs, i.e., the ability and intention to control/move the drugs.

    Related: Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer – Reasonable Suspicion vs. Probable Cause in Drug Possession and Related Drug Cases

    Below are two examples of when individuals had constructive possession of drugs.

    Example 1: A police officer sees a group of people at a corner that is well known for drug dealing in Philadelphia.  As the officer approaches the group, the people start to walk away.  The officer sees a small bag drop out of an individual’s pocket as he is walking away.  The officer stops the individual and sees that the bag that dropped out is a bag of heroin.  The individual is charged with possession.  The prosecution argues that the individual had constructive possession.  He knew where the drugs were located when the officer found it because he tossed it out of his pocket.  He knew that heroin is illegal.  Lastly, he had control and the ability to move it, i.e., throw it out of his pocket.

    Example 2: During a search of a home, large amounts of heroin and cocaine were found in a room that appears to be a home gym.  Two individuals live in the home, and they are arrested and charged with PWID.  One individual argues that he knew nothing about the drugs, but the prosecution may argue otherwise. The prosecution may allege that he had constructive possession of the drugs because he used the home gym.  He knew where the drugs were located, and knew or should have known that the drugs are illegal.  In addition, he had control of the drugs because they were in plain sight on a table.

    Help after Charged with Drug Possession in Philadelphia

    David Nenner has been a criminal defense lawyer in Philadelphia for over 30 years, and has been rated as a Top Philadelphia Criminal Defense lawyer.  Unlike many criminal defense lawyers, Mr. Nenner offers FREE consultations.  215.564.0644

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...