FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    How Police Corruption Affects Your Philadelphia Criminal Case

    The problem of police corruption in Philadelphia and the surrounding areas is a very real one. Within the last few years, there have been multiple reports of Philadelphia police officers engaging in corrupt practices, such as:

    • stealing drugs from drug dealers,
    • stealing money from businesses, and
    • lying under oath (lying on affidavits or at hearings).

    These are just some of the types of corrupt behavior police officers have been accused of engaging in. Some officers have been accused of planting evidence, i.e., planting stolen drugs in the car or home of an alleged drug dealer or suspect. Other officers have been accused of assaulting and threatening individuals during investigations.

    Related: Philadelphia PA Drug Cases Thrown Out Due to Corruption in Philadelphia’s Police Department

    In more serious cases such as murder cases, officers have been accused of wrongfully zeroing in on a suspect and all but fabricating evidence to get a conviction. Read more about police investigation in murder cases.

    Many citizens of Philadelphia who are arrested and charged with a crime often want to know whether they can make a claim that the police officer was corrupt in order to get the case dismissed. The answer depends on a key question, is there sufficient evidence that the police officer involved in the investigation, arrest, etc., was corrupt?

    There are several issues which come into play when dealing with a potential case of police corruption in a criminal case in Philadelphia.

    Investigation

    The accused individual’s criminal lawyer must conduct a thorough investigation to determine whether there is sufficient evidence of police corruption. This means assessing the evidence and looking for any eyewitnesses who might be able to corroborate the corrupt behavior. This can sometimes be very difficult, since witnesses are often afraid of retaliation for coming forward about abusive or corrupt practices by police officers. For example, a Philadelphia business owner who doesn’t speak English well or has immigration issues may be reluctant to corroborate the fact that a police officer stole money from the business. These are some of the hurdles involved in dealing with police corruption.

    Getting the Case Dismissed

    In some cases, the evidence will be so clear, that the District Attorney’s office may voluntarily dismiss the case. This is especially true for criminal cases investigated by police officers who have already been shown to be corrupt. Basically if a case was investigated by a known, corrupt police officer, it may be tainted. The case may ultimately be dismissed voluntarily by the DA, and if not, by a judge or court.

    Dealing with Police Corruption at Trial – Cross-Examination

    At trial, police misconduct (corruption, lying, etc.) can be revealed via cross-examination. Successful cross-examination is an art form and requires a tremendous amount of preparation. The key is identifying a theme (i.e., police misconduct) and using cross-examination of officers to present that theme. Ultimately, revealing major inconsistencies in the testimony of each of the officers can lead to an acquittal.

    Civil Legal Rights

    In some cases, individuals who have been the victim of police corruption have valid civil legal rights under the U.S. and Pennsylvania constitution. Police officers are prohibited from violating an individual’s constitutional rights, including the right to due process. In certain cases, courts will find that police corruption is a violation of an individual’s due process rights. Victims may be able to receive fair, reasonable financial compensation.

    David Nenner Criminal Case Result & Analysis: Acquittal in an Attempted Murder Case in Philadelphia

    Philadelphia Criminal Lawyer

    If you were charged with a crime in the Philadelphia area and believe the officers were corrupt, please contact our office for a free consultation. Firm founder, David Nenner is an accomplished trial lawyer who specializes in criminal cases. (215) 564-0644

    Disclaimer: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Read full disclaimer below.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Attempted Murder Case – Not Guilty Jury Verdict

    Mr. Nenner presented a self-defense argument, and the jury returned a “not guilty” verdict after a 7 day trial in Philadelphia.

    3rd Degree Murder Case – Charges Dismissed for Co-Defendants

    Mr. Nenner represented co-defendants in a shooting death in North Philadelphia. Both cases were ultimately dismissed.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...