Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Search & Seizure of Drugs or Guns in Pennsylvania Criminal Cases – Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

    Under the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, law enforcement is required to obtain a warrant before conducting a search or seizure of persons or property, including homes, cars, etc. However, this rule is swallowed by its many exceptions: emergency situations or exigent circumstances, plain view, search incident to arrest, consent to search, automobile searches.

    Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement

    In this legal article, our experienced Philadelphia criminal lawyer discusses the most common exceptions to the warrant requirement:

    • emergency or exigent circumstances,
    • plain view,
    • search incident to arrest,
    • consent, and
    • automobile searches.

    For more info about Pennsylvania criminal law, visit the Philadelphia Criminal Law Library.

    Top Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer

    Philadelphia criminal lawyer David Nenner speaks with reporters. Nov. 29, 2017 *Photo credit –

    Emergency/Exigent Circumstances

    Police officers are allowed to enter property or conduct a search if there’s an emergency need or exigent circumstance. The most common examples involve entering a home to prevent the destruction of evidence or entering a home to prevent an assault. For example, a police officer is conducting a routine patrol when he hears screaming and multiple gunshots from a home. The officer could enter the home to render aid.

    Plain View

    When a police officer is carrying out their duties or is lawfully present on property, anything illegal the officer views in plain sight can be seized. For example, a police officer is responding to a theft at an apartment. When the officer is invited into the home to take information for a police report, the officer sees a gun lying next to drug paraphernalia. The officer can arrest the occupant and seize the gun and drug paraphernalia.

    Search Incident to Arrest

    When a police officer arrests an individual, the individual and their personal effects may be searched not only for safety reasons, but also for inventory purposes. For example, a police officer arrests an individual after witnessing a drug transaction on the street. The officer searches the individual’s pockets and finds a gun in a jacket pocket. The gun can be validly seized.


    Many individuals who are being questioned by police will consent to entry or search of their property, including a home or car. It is actually very common for someone to consent to search even if they have illegal items in their possession. The fear of saying no to an officer is often enough to induce someone into consenting.

    Related: Pennsylvania Search & Seizure Law in Criminal Drug & Gun Cases in Philadelphia – Collective Knowledge Doctrine [What’s the collective knowledge doctrine and when does it apply in criminal drug and gun cases in Pennsylvania? Officers in the same unit or part of the same investigation share collective knowledge, even if there’s no evidence that one officer tells another officer about some critical aspect of a case. This applies to all search and seizure cases including stop and frisk, emergency or exigent circumstances, etc.]

    Automobile Searches

    Because cars are by their very nature, mobile and any evidence in a car can be destroyed or moved, courts have carved out a large exception to the warrant requirement. Car searches and seizures of illegal items such as drugs or guns are some of the most common issues raised in motions to suppress evidence. Unfortunately, warrantless automobile searches are permitted if a police officer has probable cause that an occupant has committed a crime or that evidence of a crime will be found in the car.

    A Brief Note About Stop & Frisk

    The stop and frisk doctrine is a decades old legal rule that allows police officers to conduct brief pat downs when stopping or questioning an individual. However, it’s not an actual exception to the warrant requirement because there’s no search or seizure occurring. Rather, the rule allows a police officer to conduct a brief pat down, but only if the officer has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot, i.e., the individual being stopped or questioned is armed or dangerous. Unfortunately, Philadelphia is notorious for these types of stops and for racial disparity in the treatment of African American men.

    It’s important to note that criminal law with respect to search and seizure is very complex. There are dozens of nuances or sub rules about the exceptions, when they apply, and when they don’t apply. More importantly, they are highly fact-specific. In addition, the law is always changing. Courts routinely limit or expand an exception. It is crucial to have an experienced criminal lawyer review a criminal case to determine whether any search or seizure was legal.

    Criminal Law Firm in Philadelphia – FREE CONSULTATION

    Our Philadelphia criminal law firm offers free consultations for major drug charges such as murder or drug possession or dealing. Call (215) 564-0644.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...