Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Can My Son Be Charged with PWID After a Traffic Stop in Philadelphia?

    FAQ: My son was stopped by the police after he went through a stop sign in Philadelphia.  He was driving his friend’s car. He was charged with selling drugs after heroin and cocaine were found in the car.  It was a traffic stop.  How can he be charged with selling drugs? It wasn’t even his car.  My son is not perfect, but I know he does not sell drugs.  What can we do?

    Answer: Per Pennsylvania drug laws, a person does not have to be caught in the act of selling drugs to be charged with the crime.  Your son is being charged with Possession with Intent to Deliver (PWID) drugs, which occurs when an individual possesses illegal drugs and intends to sell them.  It is a serious offense.

    Related: Simple Possession of Drugs in Philadelphia

    Even though the police stopped your son for a traffic violation, the law allows police to search the vehicle if the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime is being committed.  For instance, if after stopping your son, the officer smelled drugs like marijuana, he then had probable cause to search the vehicle.  If the search yielded a large amount of drugs, such as small plastic bags, a scale, etc., your son would have been arrested and charged with PWID.

    It is best that we talk about your son’s PWID charge so we know all of the facts and circumstances in order to help your son.  Depending on the situation, there may be an argument that the search of the car was illegal.  Therefore, the drugs found in the car your son was driving are not admissible.  If the drugs are not admissible, then the prosecution has no case.

    Even if the search was legal, there are other defenses.  In order for you son to be convicted of PWID, the prosecution must prove the following:

    • the drugs found are controlled substances,
    • your son possessed the drugs,
    • your son knew or was aware of the item and knew that it was a controlled substance, and
    • your son possessed the drugs with the specific intent to deliver the item to another person.

    Proving the fourth element depends on the facts.  In your son’s case, because he was driving his friend’s car, there may be an argument that he did not know that the drugs were in the car.  Thus, he had no intention of delivering or selling the drugs because he didn’t even know they were in the car.

    Feel free to schedule an appointment with our office located in Philadelphia.  We offer FREE initial consultations for criminal cases in Philadelphia.  215.564.0644

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...