Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    PA Criminal Appeals and PCRA Lawyer Discusses Common Grounds of Appeal in PCRA Petitions

    After defendants are convicted in a Philadelphia criminal trial or a criminal trial in other counties, such as Montgomery County, they may file an appeal in an attempt to reverse the conviction.  One of those appeals is a PA Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition.

    There are limited grounds for defendants to file a PCRA petition.  In this article, we will discuss two of the most common grounds defendants present in their PCRA petitions.

    Click here to learn more about PA criminal appeals and PCRA petitions.

    Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

    The definition of ineffective assistance of counsel is provided in Section 9543(a)(2)(ii) of the Post Conviction Relief Act, which states:

    Ineffective assistance of counsel which, in the circumstances of the particular case, so undermined the truth-determining process that no reliable adjudication of guilt or innocence could have taken place.

    In a nutshell, defendants have a right to competent counsel.  If counsel is not competent and their actions have an adverse effect on the trial, there may be grounds for appeal.

    Defense attorneys can be ineffective in many ways.  Examples of ineffective assistance of counsel include failing to object during trial, failing to file a motion to suppress, failing to call key witnesses and failing to present evidence.  Below is an example of how counsel failed to call key witnesses during trial.

    A defendant is charged with murder of a neighbor in Philadelphia.  Defendant maintains that he was not at the crime scene when the victim was killed.  There were 3 witnesses that the defendant told his counsel about who could testify to his location at the time of the murder.  However, his attorney never interviewed these witnesses.  As a result, defendant was convicted by the jury.

    In such a situation, defense counsel was ineffective by failing to prepare and present the alibi defense.  Defendant may file a PCRA petition based on the ground that his defense lawyer was ineffective.

    Newly Discovered Evidence

    Newly discovered evidence is evidence that was not available during trial.  This new evidence, if available at trial, would have changed the outcome of the trial, i.e., acquitted the defendant.

    Per the PA statute, defendant can file a PCRA petition based on newly discovered evidence if he can prove that 1. the evidence was not available at the time of trial despite due diligence, and 2. if it had been introduced at trial, it would have changed the outcome.  See Pennsylvania Post Conviction Relief Act § 9543 (a)(2)(vi).

    Help After a Philadelphia Criminal Trial Conviction

    If you or a loved one was convicted in a criminal trial in Philadelphia and believe that you have grounds for appeal, call David Nenner.  Mr. Nenner is a Philadelphia criminal defense lawyer who is experienced in appeals and PCRA petitions.  Call 215.564.0644 to schedule a FREE consultation.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...


    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...


    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...


    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...