FREE CONSULTATIONS

Email or Call (215) 564-0644

    Philadelphia Criminal Drug Law, Suppression of Drugs & Guns Found in a Car (Part 2)

    April 29, 2014 Update: Pennsylvania Supreme Court makes major changes to auto stop and search law in drug/gun cases.

    Vehicle Searches in Philadelphia Criminal Drug Cases

    Many Philadelphia drug cases involve search of vehicles and resulting seizure of drugs/guns found in vehicles. For many residents of Philadelphia, drug/gun convictions often result in jail/prison time, loss of employment, loss of medical benefits, loss of disability benefits, etc. Therefore, it is crucial to have a potential drug/gun charge case reviewed by a skilled criminal lawyer who will be able to identify if there is a valid illegal police search issue. If there is, the case may be dismissed for lack of evidence.

    Part 1 of this article discusses vehicle searches in PA and whether warrantless searches of vehicles are illegal.

    What’s the Difference Between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause

    Probable Cause

    The difference between what is reasonable suspicion and what is probable cause is really a matter of degree. In Pennsylvania, probable cause exists where the facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed. Basically, this means that an officer has probable cause when there is a reasonable basis to believe that a crime has occurred and that the person being investigated has committed it. There must be facts and evidence to support a finding of probable cause.

    Reasonable Suspicion

    Reasonable suspicion can be described as circumstances “where a police officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude in light of his experience that criminal activity may be afoot and that the persons with whom he is dealing may be armed and presently dangerous.” This standard was first laid out in a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case, Terry v. Ohio.

    Since 1968, Pennsylvania courts have basically found that reasonable suspicion is a lesser standard than probable cause and depends on the info police have and whether that info is reliable given the circumstances of the situation. The police officer must be able to point to “specific and articulable facts” leading him to suspect criminal activity is afoot.

    Philadelphia Drug Case Hypothetical – Drugs/Guns Found in a Car

    An officer pulls a car over in North Philadelphia after allegedly seeing the car blow through a stop sign. Here, the officer has reasonable suspicion to stop the driver and obtain driver’s license and insurance information.

    As the officer walks to the driver’s side window, he sees a small package thrown out of the front passenger side window. He also smells what he knows to be the smell of burning crack cocaine when the driver rolls his window down. The driver is agitated and nervous. At this point, the officer has probable cause to believe that a violation of Pennsylvania drug law has occurred, i.e., illegal possession of drugs.

    When the officer looks into the car, he sees the handle of a gun sticking out from under between the driver’s seat and front passenger seat. Now, the officer has probable cause and an exigent circumstance, the presence of a gun which creates a risk of danger to the officer and general public. Under these circumstances, the officer would probably be able to lawfully place the driver under arrest and search the vehicle without a warrant.

    Any contraband found would be confiscated and used to support a criminal case for possession of drugs, possession of drugs with intent to deliver and/or unlawful possession of a firearm.

    Related News: David Nenner Criminal Case Result: Acquittal in an Attempted Murder Case in Philadelphia

    If you or a loved one was arrested for a drug/gun charge in Philadelphia and would like a free consultation, please call (215) 562-0644.

    *DISCLAIMER: This website does not create any attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Our lawyers provide legal advice only after accepting a case. It is imperative that any action taken is done on advice of counsel. Since each case is unique, discussion of prior outcomes and settlements in past cases is no guarantee of a similar outcome in current or future cases. Contacting our lawyers via the email contact form on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through the contact form.

    David S. Nenner

    "Top Rated Criminal Defense Lawyer"
    (2015-2022)

    MURDER, Att. Murder CHARGES – Negotiated Significantly Lower prison sentence (Feb. 2022, PHILA)

    Mr. Anderson faced murder and attempted murder charges after an incident in Northeast Philadelphia involving the shooting death of Anderson’s sister’s boyfriend and the boyfriend’s roommate who was shot 5 times and survived. The decedent had previously beaten the...

    Att. MURDER CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (April 2022, PHILA)

    The Commonwealth alleged that Mr. Shelton shot and seriously injured a male in a bar in North Philadelphia called Circles. There was video of the shooting which happened outside the bar. However, Mr. Nenner presented witnesses who testified that the person in the bar...

    MURDER, Robbery CHARGES – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner's client was charged with multiple crimes (murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, robbery, etc.) after a shooting death occurred at a gambling house in North Philadelphia. At trial, Mr. Nenner successfully presented a self-defense argument and convinced...

    MURDER CHARGE – NOT GUILTY JURY VERDICT (MAY 2021, PHILA)

    Mr. Nenner’s client was charged with murder and gun charges in Philadelphia. The client was accused of shooting and killing another male on Arch Street near the 5600 block of Ithan Street in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty after deliberating...

    Drug Possession Case – Motion to Suppress Granted

    Mr. Nenner presented evidence that to show that the traffic stop was a pretextual stop. The officer had no reason to pull the car over. The judge agreed and suppressed the evidence. As a result, the prosecution withdrew the charges.

    Sentencing for 1st Degree Murder in PA

    In this article below we discuss sentencing for 1st degree murder cases in Pennsylvania. In later articles, we will discuss sentencing for 2nd and 3rd degree murder cases. If you or a loved one is facing murder charges in Philadelphia or the surrounding counties,...

    Philadelphia Criminal Trials – Evidence Pointing to Another Perpetrator in Drug Possession or Drug Manufacture Cases

    In criminal trials in Philadelphia, one pretty common defense tactic is pointing the finger at another person at trial. This can raise enough doubt to result in a not guilty verdict by the judge or jury that the defendant was not the perpetrator of the crime. Here’s...

    Philadelphia Murder & Gun Possession Cases Increasing in 2021 – A Look at Common Charges & Defenses

    A look at PA criminal law for Murder (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree), Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Philadelphia (misdemeanor).

    Pennsylvania Murder Charges, Deceased Person’s Statements Used to Prove Guilt

    Defense Trial Strategies – Excluding Statements That Accuse the Defendant Prosecutors often look to a deceased individual’s statements made prior to a murder to show that the defendant is guilty. These statements may point to a history of violence between the deceased...

    Pennsylvania (State) Drug Charges, Dog Sniffs & Constitutional Law

    Federal and Pennsylvania state courts treat narcotics dog searches differently. So different that the same scenario could result in different outcomes in federal versus state court. For example, a Philadelphia resident is pulled over for speeding. During the traffic...